Handing the White House a huge judicial victory, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Trump’s travel ban affecting residents of six majority-Muslim countries.
Lower courts had wrongly ruled people from those countries with a "bona fide" relationship with someone in the United States could not be prevented from entry.
Grandparents and cousins were among the relatives that lower courts said could not be excluded. Well, it turns out the courts were wrong.
Had any of the judges on those court bothered to read the actual LAW, they would have known they were wrong.
EDITOR's PERSONAL OPINION - But, given the fact that many of the judges involved are left-wing, liberals in their personal political ideology - which makes them judicial assholes - they didn't seem to bother reading what the law actually said, they instead made ruling based upon political-correctness or feelings.
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor said they would have left the lower court orders in place.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of President Trump’s travel ban affecting residents of six majority-Muslim countries. The ban applies to people from Syria, Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia and Yemen.
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER & FACEBOOKFollow @realhalturner
FOLLOW ME ON FACEBOOK