Category: U.S. National News
Wednesday, 03 October 2018 01:39
Did Christine Blasey-Ford commit Perjury during her testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding Supreme Court Nominee Brett Kavanaugh? Some think she did and they are offering what they call evidence to prove it. I have that evidence!
Moreover, some interesting other items and issues have turned up about this woman, including the scrubbing of Criminal Charges from her record weeks before she began accusing Kavanaugh, and her testimony about being a Research Psychologist when she does not appear to hold a California License for that profession!
Former long-time boyfriend of Ford told the Senate Judiciary Committee he witnessed her coaching a friend on a polygraph examination. Here is an image of a letter sent to the Committee by that 6 year boyfriend:
That friend, Monica L. McLean, went on to become . . . an FBI person! Here is proof from an FBI court filing:
Later. that same Monica L. McLean went to work for . . . the U.S. Justice Department, in the Southern District of New York (SDNY). Here's proof:
Yet during her sworn testimony, Blasey-Ford was asked TWICE (under Oath) if she ever helped a friend prepare for a polygraph. Here's the transcript of those questions from the US Senate Judiciary Committee hearing:
On Tuesday, October 2, Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley sent a letter to Blasey-Ford's lawyers asking for specific files and pointing out the Committee sees this boyfriend letter as a discrepancy in Blasey-Ford's SWORN testimony. Here is the Letter sent by Chairman Grassley:
There is also the claim that Blasey-Ford didn't want to come to Washington, DC to testify because she was afraid of flying. That now appears to be an outright falsehood, designed to further obstruct and delay the Judiciary Committee's work in the Kavanaugh confirmation Hearing. While not a matter of Perjury, it does point to potential Obstruction and is also a point made in the letter sent to the Judiciary Committee by the former boyfriend in the letter above!
In addition, there is also the matter of Blasey-Ford saying she is a "Psychologist." Ms. Blasey-Ford resides in California and under California law, no person can refer to themselves as such, unless they hold a valid License from the state. According to California records, there is no License issued which would allow Blasey-Ford to call herself a "Psychologist."
Two other items worth noting:
Testifying under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Christine Blasey-Ford identified herself as a ‘psychologist,’ but records indict this is a false statement under California law. Someone at Stanford University also appears to have caught the blunder and edited Ford’s faculty page.
Just one sentence into her sworn testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding allegations of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, Dr. Christine Blasey-Ford may have told a lie.
After thanking members of the committee on Thursday, and while under oath, Ford opened her testimony saying, “My name is Christine Blasey-Ford, I am a professor of psychology at Palo Alto University and a research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine.”
The issue lies with the word “psychologist,” and Ford potentially misrepresenting herself and her credentials, an infraction that is taken very seriously in the psychology field as well as under California law.
Under California law, as with almost every other state, in order for a person to identify publicly as a psychologist they must be licensed by the California Board of Psychology, a process that includes 3,000 hours of post-doctoral professional experience and passing two rigorous exams. To call oneself a psychologist without being licensed by a state board is the equivalent of a law school graduate calling herself a lawyer without ever taking the bar exam.
According to records, Ford is not licensed in the state of California. A recent search through the Department of Consumer Affairs License Bureau, which provides a state-run database of all licensed psychologists in California, produced no results for any variation of spelling on Ford’s name. If Ford at one time had a license but it is now inactive, she would legally still be allowed to call herself a “psychologist” but forbidden from practicing psychology on patients until it was renewed. However, the database would have shown any past licenses granted to Ford, even if they were inactive.
Ford also does not appear to have been licensed in any other states outside California. Since graduating with a PhD in educational psychology from the University of Southern California in 1996 it does not appear Ford has spent any significant amount of time outside the state. She married her husband in California in 2002, and completed a master’s degree in California in 2009. She reportedly completed an internship in Hawaii, but a search of Hawaii’s Board of Psychology licensing database also did not turn up any results for Ford.
What makes Ford’s claim even more suspicious is someone affiliated with Stanford University appears to have also been aware of the potentially damning use of the word “psychologist” and rushed to cover for Ford. An archived version of Ford’s page on the school’s faculty directory shows the "scrubbing" that was done.
On September 10, 2015, the only archived date available, Ford’s faculty page was saved to the Wayback Machine and showed Ford listed as a “research psychologist” along with her email address and office phone number.
The most recent version of that page shows Ford listed only as an “Affiliate” in the department, with the words “research psychologist” removed along with Ford’s email address and phone number. This suggests the page was altered by someone very recently to scrub Ford’s contact information and title after she entered the national spotlight.
Aside from potentially misleading the committee, Ford also appears to have violated California law. California’s Business and Professional Code Sections 2900-2919 govern the state’s laws for practicing psychology. Section 2903 reads,
“No person may engage in the practice of psychology, or represent himself or herself to be a psychologist, without a license granted under this chapter, except as otherwise provided in this chapter.” Section 2902(c) states: (c) “A person represents himself or herself to be a psychologist when the person holds himself or herself out to the public by any title or description of services incorporating the words ‘psychology,’ ‘psychological,’ ‘psychologist,’ ‘psychology consultation,’ ‘psychology consultant,’ ‘psychometry,’ ‘psychometrics’ or ‘psychometrist,’ ‘psychotherapy,’ ‘psychotherapist,’ ‘psychoanalysis,’ or ‘psychoanalyst,’ or when the person holds himself or herself out to be trained, experienced, or an expert in the field of psychology.”
This appears to include titles like “research psychologist.” There is one specific exemption to the law regarding the title “school psychologist,” which refers to school counselors who do not need to be licensed. School psychologists are legally forbidden from referring to themselves as simply “psychologists.”
Whereas the term “research psychologist” may be common in academic parlance, and permissible within accredited institutions, the issue seems to be publicly presenting oneself under any title containing the word “psychologist” if a person is not licensed. Ford is a professor and a researcher, but not a psychologist. Section 2910 of the law states, “This chapter shall not be construed to restrict the practice of psychology on the part of persons who are salaried employees of accredited or approved academic institutions, public schools, or governmental agencies, if those employees are complying with the following (1) Performing those psychological activities as part of the duties for which they were hired. (2) Performing those activities solely within the jurisdiction or confines of those organizations. (3) Do not hold themselves out to the public by any title or description of activities incorporating the words ‘psychology,’ ‘psychological,’ or ‘psychologist.'”
It is unknown why Ford, 51, a seasoned academic in the field of psychology would have made such an obvious mistake unless she was unaware of the law or trying to intentionally mislead the public and members of the committee about her credentials.
Arrest Record Scrubbed?
Christine Blasey lived in Potomac, Maryland in 1985.
Christine was arrested in a traffic stop and ticketed on June 14, 1985 (Friday) in Catawba County North Carolina.
She was charged with a traffic misdemeanor – no big deal. It was disposed on Sept 11, 1985.
But there’s more.
There were two other cases on June 17, 1985 (Monday). They were also in Catawba County on a different day and are under case type – CRIMINAL. This might be the same case, but two different records were given.
The interesting thing about these two cases against Christine Blasey-Ford is that they were last updated on July 7, 2018.
Is that when they were expunged?
Ford’s letter to Rep. Eschoo and Senator Feinstein was dated on July 30, 2018 and signed by Christine Blasey.
Here is the record from July 7, 2018 SHOWING THE CRIMINAL CHARGE "DISPOSED." Was someone cleaning up Blasey-Ford's record just weeks before she launched her accusations?
Here is the record of the charges being "DISPOSED."
Who would make an effort to clean-up Blasey-Ford's records just weeks before her accusations against Kavanaugh and who had the POWER/ABILITY to do so? . . .
According to radio host Michael Savage, Christine Blasey-Ford JUST SO HAPPENS TO HEAD UP THE CIA UNDERGRADUATE INTERNSHIP PROGRAM AT STANFORD UNIVERSITY.
Ahhhh, the "Deep State" seems to be exposed yet again; this time meddling with the nomination of a US Supreme Court Justice. They really do seem to have their filthy tentacles in just about everything, don't they?
If it turns out that Christine Blasey-Ford made these accusations against Kavanaugh at the suggestion or behest of the CIA, then we're looking at a government agency that actively tried to subvert its own elected government; a potential scandal that is literally miles worse than Watergate.
I will be discussing this on my talk-radio show Wednesday, October 3, from 9-11 PM eastern US time on WBCQ 7.490 AM, and WRMI 9.455 AM, both Global High-Frequency stations (i.e. shortwave), and on KYAH 540-AM, "Utah's Talk-Authority." You can tune-in right here on the Internet at HalTurnerRadioShow.com using the LISTEN LIVE Buttons in the menu bar above the news. Be advised however that those links DO NOT GO LIVE until about one hour before my show begins. During that hour, they stream commercial free music from the 70's and 80's until my show starts. Be sure to tune-in!