Write a comment

UPDATED 8:30 AM EDT SUNDAY, 27 MAY (SEE BOTTOM) -- Tommy Robinson, co-founder of the English Defense League (EDL), was arrested outside the Leeds Crown Court located at 1 Oxford Row in Leeds, UK on Friday.  

He was standing quietly outside the public courthouse engaging in video broadcasting via cellphone through the Internet site Facebook about a child grooming sexual predator trial.  Despite not uttering a word, he was accosted by three British police officers, shown below, and told he was being arrested on "suspicion of breaching the peace" and Incitement."

Here are the police officers who perpetrated this repression  (Click on any image to enlarge)

                        

Robinson live-streamed ‘reports’ from outside Leeds Crown Court for about an hour Friday morning. He showed men entering the court via Facebook video until he was approached by officers telling him to stop.

In a separate video, the far-right activist is filmed being led away by police, arresting him for an alleged breach of the peace and incitement. He’s heard asking one of his supporters: ‘Can you get me a solicitor?

‘This is ridiculous, I haven’t said a word. I’ve done nothing.’ He’s then filmed by another bystander asking the police officers if he’s being arrested on ‘contempt of court’.

Before he’s bundled into the police van, he says: ‘Someone laid their hand and assaulted me outside court. ‘Other people have sworn at me and threatened me about my mother and here I am being arrested for saying nothing.’

Robinson is already under a suspended sentence over contempt of court at a gang rape trial in Canterbury last year.

People or newspapers can be in ‘contempt of court’ when they create a ‘substantial risk’ of prejudicing on ongoing court case. It is a criminal offence that can land people in jail.

In under ONE HOUR, Robinson had been arrested, tried and sentenced . . .  13 Months in jail.

So determined were the British to CONCEAL what they did, The UK government attempted to silence any conversation about his situation by issuing a ban against the press covering the case.  Here is a copy:

 

Here is the Judge who issued the Order:

Geoffrey Marson, Judge, Queens Court, Leeds, UK

Solicitors from the UK have told me that his judge is what Americans call a "Liberal Snowflake."   They also told me he has terrible breath, severe body odor, and the wig he wears on the bench seems to be so filthy, it gives off "a malignant odor of fungus or mildew."

They report that appearing in court before this man is "an exercise in dealing with the most foul stench"  and "A painful excursion into political correctness, before a totalitarian despot Drone, who is so full of himself, it makes one sick."

That type of repression and Press Censorship was two of the reasons then-Colonists in America gunned-down British troops, pulled British Governors out of their homes and Lynched them from trees, beat British Magistrate-Judges to death / burned down their houses, and ultimately overthrew King George III by force, back around the year 1776. British law therefore cannot be applied to news media in the U.S.A. like The Hal Turner Radio Show and this media outlet will not comply.

Clearly, the British government has forgotten the lessons they were so brutally taught in 1776.  Some in the UK say they are starting to feel as though the British government needs to be reminded.

 

COMMENTARY

It is truly a shame that once-great Britain has fallen under the hideous mental illness of political correctness.  That nation is literally committing suicide by importing thousands of third-world savages who rape, rob, pillage, burn and kill . . . while useful idiots in the police assist this British suicide by arresting anyone who complains about the death of the country.

With mindless Drones like the police officers shown above, (who do as they're told rather than thinking for themselves) it seems to me England is truly on its deathbed.

This was a despicable display of politically-correct totalitarianism; where a citizen is arrested for merely taking video on a public street, (where there is no expectation of privacy) because some British government imbecile wants to conceal the crime wave sweeping Britain. 

One wonders how such utterly stupid people ever get government jobs in the first place?

 

UPDATE 8:30 AM EDT (Sunday 27 May) --

It turns out that it was not police who CHOSE to have Tommy Robinson arrested, it was apparently the Judge shown above who may have ORDERED it. 

Additional photos have come into The Hal Turner Radio Show and the images seem to show Judge Geoffrey Marson looking out a courthouse window in the company of one of the police officers (female) who ultimately effected the arrest:

Here is the officer the Judge appears to be standing with:

 

Tommy Robinson  was admonished last year by Judge Heather Norton for filming outside a gang rape case in Canterbury, who slapped him with a three month suspended sentence on the condition that he cease his coverage of the trials. 

you should be under no illusions that if you commit any further offence of any kind, and that would include, I would have thought a further contempt of court by similar actions, then that sentence of three months would be activated -Judge Heather Norton

“This is not about free speech, not about the freedom of the press, nor about legitimate journalism, and not about political correctness,” the judge told Robinson at the time.

Well, lowly public servants like Judges do not get to decide for everyone else what something is about.  People are free to have their own views about freedom of speech and freedom of the press.  Judges may have a point of view, but their view is no more valuable than anyone else's.  It is quite arrogant of such public servants to decide for everyone else what an issue is about.  

Here in the United States, when any person is charged with a crime, that is "news" upon which the Press (like me) report. 

The calling of a criminal trial and the conduct of that trial is also "news" whether courts think so or not. 

You see, here in America, We The People decide what is "news."  Courts have nothing to say about it. 

We in the media have a very good sense about the type of information people want and we provide that in order to remain popular and relevant . . .  and to remain in business.

Grown men charged with raping young children is, in every regard, "news."  

When some such men are alleged to have bent these young children over a table, then NAILED THEIR TONGUE TO THE TABLE TO PREVENT THEM FROM STANDING UP, FIGHTING BACK, OR ESCAPING, while dozens of other men anally and/or vaginally rape those children over an entire weekend, that is "news."

It matters not what lowly public servants like judges think about the topic, what matters is that free people and a free press decide what is "news."  That is unless, of course, certain Judges get-off on this type of violent sexual degeneracy and are somehow trying to minimize public disgust at their own fetish?  I wonder if Judge Marson has such proclivities?

Nonetheless, the British Courts may be able to silence British Press, but they cannot silence American Press because here in America, we are free.  Our freedom is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits our Congress from ". . .  abridging the freedom of speech or of the press . . . ."  

Bear in mind too, that the Internet is an American invention.  It was developed by the United States Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).  The web site you are presently reading this from is registered via an American registrar, owned by an American Company. The servers through which this article is provided exist in America and are owned by an AMERICAN company.  No one is ever forced to read what is here unless they deliberately instruct their web browser to come get our content FROM AMERICA.

It is these realities that make American media coverage protected by the American Constitution regardless of where our content may be read because that content resides in AMERICA.

So for the folks in British Courts who think they're powerful enough to silence the free press, behold now,  what _real_ power actually is . . . 

Here is a full list of the Defendants who are on trial:

 

Pedophile grooming gangs

A group of 29 defendants are being tried  for historical sex offences against children, split into three trials. Robinson was arrested at the second trial, while the first is ongoing.

For more on the grooming gangs which have abused over 700 women and girls, click here.

Meanwhile, enraged Britons have been harassing the defendants as they make their way to court in the ongoing trials. 

First Trial

Amere Singh Dhaliwal, 34, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., is accused of 54 charges, including 21 charges of rape and 14 charges of trafficking with a view of sexual exploitation. Dhaliwal is accused of charges against eleven different girls from 2004 to 2011.

Irfan Ahmed, 32, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with nine offences including making an indecent image of a child.

Zahid Hassan, 28, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with 20 offences including six charges of raping a girl aged 13 or under.

Mohammed Kammer, 32, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with two offences including rape of a girl under 15.

Mohammed Aslam, 29, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with two offences including rape of a girl under 15.

Abdul Rehman, 30, from Sheffield, South Yorks., was charged with seven offences including raping a girl under 15.

Raj Singh Barsran, 32, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with three offences including sexual touching of a girl over 13.

Nahman Mohammed, 31 from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with three counts including trafficking a person for sexual exploitation.

Zubair Ahmed, 30, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with two offences including raping a girl under the age 15.

Hamzha Saleem, 37, from Old traddford, Gtr Mancs., was charged with three counts including human trafficking.

Second Trial (Robinson's arrest)

Mansoor Akhtar, 25, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with three offences including attempted rape of a girl under the age of 13.

Mohammed Asaf Akram, 31, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with 14 offences including four charges of raping a girl of thirteen or under and one charge of threatening to kill.

Wiqas Mahmud, 36 from Huddersfield, West Yorks.., was charged with three offences of rape of a girl under 15.

Nasarat Hussain, 28, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with five offences including rape of a girl under 15.

Sajid Hussain, 32, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with five offences including rape of a girl under 15.

Mohammed Irfraz, 28, from Huddersfield, West Yorks.., was charged with eight offences including false imprisonment.

Faisal Nadeem, 30 from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with three counts including raping a woman 16 or over.

Mohammed Azeem, 31, from Bradford, West Yorks., was charged with three offences including rape of a girl under 15.

Zulquarnian Dogar, 29, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with two offences including sexual touching of a female aged 13 or over.

Manzoor Hassan, 37, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with four offences including inciting the sexual exploitation of a child aged between 13-17.

Third trial set to last for six weeks.

Niaz Ahmed, 53, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with three offences including sexual assault on a female.

Mohammed Imran Ibrar, 32, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with four offences including arranging the commission of a child sex offence.

Asif Bashir, 32, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with five offences, including three counts of raping a woman 16 or over.

Everton la Bastide, 50, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with two offences including sexual touching a girl of 13 or over.

Saqib Raheel, 30, from Dudley was charged with two offences including trafficking for sexual exploitation.

Usman Khalid, 29, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with three offences including assaulting a girl under 13.

Aleem Javaid, 27, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with two offences including supply of a class B drug.

Mrs Naveeda Habib, 38, from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged on one count of neglect of a child.

Mrs Shahnaz Malik, 55 from Huddersfield, West Yorks., was charged with one count of neglecting a child.

 SOURCE: The Sun Newspaper . . .  in Britain!

 

(EDITOR'S NOTE: The fact that this information was already published by a British Newspaper, but Tommy Robinson was arrested for covering the trials, is very telling.  The Sun has high paid lawyers that can battle back when courts overstep their bounds.  But poor Tommy Robinson doesn't have such vast corporate resources, so malignant and abusive judges think they can get away with harming him.  that makes such Judges nothing more than odious Bullies!)  

 

 

 

 

 

Say something here...
You are a guest ( Sign Up ? )
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.

Be the first to comment.