DC Metro Police Attempting to BAN "ALL" FIREARMS During Jan. 4-6 Rally; Cite Law Which Applies SOLELY to "Licensed Pistols" and NOT to Rifles or Shotguns . . .They're afraid !
The corrupt Washington, DC Metro Police Department is trying to pull a fast-one; they're placing signs on street lamp posts banning "ALL" Firearms from January 4 through 7 when American citizens are coming to town to confront Congress against adopting fraudulent Electors from the Nov. 3 election, and completing the THEFT of the Presidency; but the notice cites a local city ordinance that applies ONLY to "Licensed Pistols" and makes no mention of rifles or shotguns.
IF Blue ISIS tries to disarm and "arrest" a citizen, morally you have the right to use lethal force to Like lamented that they did not defend themselves from the tyrannical "organs" of the USSR:
"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? After all, you knew ahead of time that those bluecaps were out at night for no good purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you'd be cracking the skull of a cutthroat. Or what about the Black Maria sitting out there on the street with one lonely chauffeur -- what if it had been driven off or its tires spiked. The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!"
~ Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn
Except I forgot that Trump can not pardon state offenses. There has to be an angle that he could use....
Now THAT would get the “point” across and would be quite visually impacting. I like it. I like it a lot!
Do not let the police take anyone away. Not one law abiding citizen!
Those who go on Jan 6 outnumber the police massively! If the police try to snatch someone illegally NOW is the time to remind the police of why they SHOULD be scared.
ON Jan 6 the police have NO authority. Their might doesn't make right....ours does.
Be peaceful. Be respectful. Follow the just laws, but don't tolerate authorities telling you what to do.
LONG LIVE FREEDOM!
For starters Jamestannon I can't name a single law that is legitimate from just a constitutional perspective. What you have with police looks a hell of lot like the guards at Auschwitz that no matter how evil their actions they claim that they were just following orders.
We should NOT have a standing army in blue lording over us in a free country!!
'Should he [Pence] do so, it would likely push the inauguration day beyond January 20th, which is perfectly fine with the Twelfth Amendment, which states that the inauguration can be as late as March 4th in cases of a contested election."
Some other things I liked:
"Two foreign spy agencies have proof of massive election fraud in the USA. We believe it’s Israel and Russia. Israel is turning over this evidence to Trump’s team."
"What will happen when Trump is confirmed the winner: Left-wing cities erupt into mass violence."
On the vaccine front there is also this:
"Fauci the fraud reveals that coronavirus vaccines don’t prevent infections but rather were designed merely to mask symptoms of covid. This is an open admission that the vaccines are a total fraud, and that the vaccine industry’s antibody theory has been completely abandoned by the vaccine propagandists themselves."
Sec 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law?
Or do we have to wait until actual physical injustice is committed for the dc police to be in violation of these statutes?