House passes resolution disapproving of Russia being included in future G7 summits

House passes resolution disapproving of Russia being included in future G7 summits
6 Comments

The House on Tuesday passed a resolution disapproving of Russia being included in future Group of Seven (G-7) summits in a 339-71 vote on Tuesday.

The resolution was introduced by Rep. Albio Sires (D-N.J.) [pictured above] in August after President Trump said in August he believed Russia should be readmitted into the G-7. Russia was expelled from the G-8 in 2014 due to its occupation of territory in Ukraine.

The resolution includes language reiterating the United States’ support for Ukraine while denouncing the country’s occupation of Crimea and destabilization in the region.

The measure also condemns the “Kremlin’s assaults on democratic societies worldwide, including in the United States and other Group of Seven countries,” and calls of the leaders of the G-7 to oppose Russia rejoining the group unless it ends its occupation of “ Ukraine’s sovereign territory, including Crimea” and attacks on democracies around the world.

“Time and time again, Russia has shown it has no respect for the territorial or democratic integrity of other nations,” Sires said in a statement after it passed out of committee. “ … Russia has not met any of the conditions but has become more aggressive in Ukraine and has undermined democracy in numerous other countries, including the United States.

 

HAL TURNER COMMENTARY

In the interest of full disclosure, Congressman Albio Sires (D-NJ) is MY elected "Representative."  Sadly, this man's actions indicate to me that he is both disobedient and defiant of those he is paid to "represent." 

In my personal view, Congressman Sires is trying to start a war with Russia, and trying to get ME, MY FAMILY and tens-of-millions of YOU, killed!

Today's Resolution contains willful lies claiming:

 1) Russia "occupies" Crimea, AND;

2) Kremlin assaults on democratic societies worldwide, including the US.

Both these points are fraudulent.

The citizens of Crimea VOTED in a free and open Referendum, to leave Ukraine and return to Russia.  Remember, Crimea was always part of Russia until former Soviet leader Kruschev GAVE that land to Ukraine about 50 years ago.  That land wasn't Kruschev's to give, and the people on that land have freely voted to return to Russia.  As such, there is no "occupation" of Crimea by Russia.

Congressman Sires Resolution is FALSE and FRAUDULENT on this point.

There have been no "Kremlin assaults on democratic societies . . ."   This claim is as fake as the so-called "Russia collusion" hoax perpetrated by the failed Hillary Clinton presidential campaign and the Democrat Party.   The Clinton campaign and its supporters in the former Obama regime, intentionally made up this fraudulent claim to destabilize Donald Trump, who defeated them fair and square.  The Democrat Party gleefully peddled this false claim for over two years until Special COunsel Robert Mueller issued his report showing the claim to be false.

Why then, is Congressman Sires perpetuating this LIE?

Why did so many other members of Congress vote in favor of this resolution when it is so clearly false?

They HAVE to.  

They HAVE TO START A WAR to get several large US cities nuked, and Russia and China are the only nations on earth who can actually do that.

You see, Congressman Sires and a slew of others, have been around long enough where a large majority of the United States $23 TRILLION debt, has accrued with their votes.

That debt is now so large, that the US Gov't is rapidly approaching a point where they will not be able to pay all the INTEREST - never mind the principal.

But Congress cannot cut spending to pay off the debt because 85% of federal spending is "Entitlement" programs: Social Security, Medicare, Welfare, Food Stamps, Housing assistance and the rest.  If Congress cuts that spending, the affected people will vote them out.  Congress does not want to get voted out.

Well, if they cannot CUT spending, then how can they deal with the coming economic reality of being unable to pay even the INTEREST on the debt?   Easy: KILL OFF the people receiving the 85% of federal spending!

Where are most welfare recipients living?  The big cities.  

What would a nuclear war target first?   Yep, those big cities.

Starting a limited nuclear war with Russia and/or China would therefore achieve both things CONGRESS NEEDS:   It would kill off the people getting the bulk of the free government money AND . . .

Congress could turn to our Creditors and say "the country is smashed, our people are dead, there's no way we can ever repay the $23 TRILLION.  We must have debt forgiveness.

The Creditors will have no choice but to walk away.  

It's a "win-win" for the government.  They get to kill off the people they've been paying AND get to get out of debt.

When the war is over, these people think they'll come out from their secret government bunker holes in the ground, and get to continue in government!

Well, those who see this coming do not share that view.  When they come out of their secret government bunker holes in the ground, some of the people who survived, will likely hold them accountable. 

But how many tens-of-millions of YOU will be dead because these people are shit-stirring with Russia, based on falsehoods?

Now that you have read this story, please COVER THE COST for what your visit cost this site by clicking one or more of the ads below which generates Advertiser revenue of two to three cents per click - no purchase necessary by you -- and helps offset operating costs for this web site.

When YOU read a story here, the web hosting company charges us for "data transfer / Bandwidth" to convey the material to you.  Without your help by clicking an ad below, this web site would be in danger of shut down from the data transfer charges.  Please click any ad below to offset the cost of bringing this news to you.

 

 

House Committee on Foreign Affairs Ranking Member Mike McCaul (R-Texas) praised Sires' work on the measure.

“As stated in this resolution, Russia should be not be readmitted to the Group of Seven until Putin respects the principles shared by the other members, relinquishes his chokehold over Crimea, and ceases his global attacks on democratic institutions. Maintaining the integrity of the Group of Seven is vital to the Group’s success, and Russia cannot be allowed to bully its way back in," he said on the floor ahead of the vote.

“So I would like to thank Representative Sires for his hard work on this resolution and my good friend Representative Smith for championing this resolution today."

The resolution passed out of committee unanimously earlier this year.

You must login to post a comment.
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • This commment is unpublished.
    Ronald Cordova · 9 days ago
    I'm with you on this one Hal. Ukraine has always been USSR before and after WW2.

    Russia has no need to 1st strike the USA or any other Nation. They always built DEFENSE weapons and placed then to protect he Motherland. The USA on the other hand would 1st strike if it thought it could win.
  • This commment is unpublished.
    Charles Yearwood · 10 days ago
    Hal, I don't mean this like it sounds but I think you've fallen a little too much for Russian propaganda. Russia's occupation of Ukrainian territory is totally illegitimate and violates international law. Their occupation of Crimea has not been recognized as legitimate by anyone except Russia. My feelings about Russians go all the way back to the Cold War; nothing coming from neocons or even democrats. I don't trust either of those groups. Like you, I don't want the US to attack Russia but if Russia attacks us then hell yes we shoot back at them. I have family and friends who have personally suffered at the hands of Russians. Russians are one of the most treacherous groups of people in the world and are not to be trusted. You trust Russians only at your own peril.
  • This commment is unpublished.
    Gifford Rodine · 10 days ago
    Now think of all the fentanyl and possibly carfentanil that china and the mexican cartels/moslems have brought into the USA. Enough to kill every USA citizen at 4 milligrams and 2 milligrams respectively. It might not be a nuclear war but a death by drugs war. Maybe that is why President Trump has put mexico on notice.

    Thanks Hal for your courage! It gets a person to thinking.
  • This commment is unpublished.
    John Robert Mallernee · 10 days ago
    Is it true that America and Russia have swapped their respective value systems, i.e., America becoming wicked and Communist, while Russia becomes Christian and free?
  • This commment is unpublished.
    Thomas N. Kuss II · 10 days ago
    Iran is a Major Problem... BUT: (Congress wants War)
    The Berlin Wall Fell and people assumed the Old Soviet Union (Communism) was Defeated. Yet, there was “A much greater Story never conveyed to the American Public.” President Reagan (Hollywood Actor) knew how to make a good Movie, even on the Presidential Stage, projecting to Citizens of America whom wanted Reasons why so much of the National Treasure was Spent on Huge Nuclear Arsenals. So the decision made was to “Project Power instead of a Warning.” This worked out great for Our Republican Party (member). But how about Reality? I bring this up because the Real Danger has Kicked into High Gear. What is that Danger? “The IDEA consummated by both the Democratic and Republican Parties,” that, “Russia is still Our Bitter Enemy,” whom, “We can Defeat in a Nuclear War.” This Assumption is High on the Political Agenda today in Washington DC. Especially among those “Conspirators (Congress & Deep State) Involved in the Coup D’etat,” against, “The United States Federal Government (President Trump Administration),” whom have “Assigned Nuclear Bomb Shelters,” called, “Deep Underground Military Bases or D.U.M.B.S,” which “They (Congress & Deep State) go too,” and “Can live Underground in Comfort for Years (Necessary).” This Action would help Them (Congress & Deep State) Evade Justice (Charges of Treason), but would Absolutely Destroy Planet Earth. People would not be able to live on the surface of the Earth. In other words, “You and I normal Citizens shall Die a Horrible Death.” Please let that sink into Your Minds. Radiation from most Nuclear Devices (after use) takes over 50,000 years to disappear, allowing “People to Return to Earth’s Surface.” Look at this Chart of the Current Nuclear Weapons as follows: The Berlin Wall Fell and people assumed the Old Soviet Union (Communism) was Defeated. Yet, there was “A much greater Story never conveyed to the American Public.” President Reagan (Hollywood Actor) knew how to make a good Movie, even on the Presidential Stage, projecting to Citizens of America whom wanted Reasons why so much of the National Treasure was Spent on Huge Nuclear Arsenals. So the decision made was to “Project Power instead of a Warning.” This worked out great for Our Republican Party (member). But how about Reality? I bring this up because the Real Danger has Kicked into High Gear. What is that Danger? “The IDEA consummated by both the Democratic and Republican Parties,” that, “Russia is still Our Bitter Enemy,” whom, “We can Defeat in a Nuclear War.” This Assumption is High on the Political Agenda today in Washington DC. Especially among those “Conspirators (Congress & Deep State) Involved in the Coup D’etat,” against, “The United States Federal Government (President Trump Administration),” whom have “Assigned Nuclear Bomb Shelters,” called, “Deep Underground Military Bases or D.U.M.B.S,” which “They (Congress & Deep State) go too,” and “Can live Underground in Comfort for Years (Necessary).” This Action would help Them (Congress & Deep State) Evade Justice (Charges of Treason), but would Absolutely Destroy Planet Earth. People would not be able to live on the surface of the Earth. In other words, “You and I normal Citizens shall Die a Horrible Death.” Please let that sink into Your Minds. Radiation from most Nuclear Devices (after use) takes over 50,000 years to disappear, allowing “People to Return to Earth’s Surface." I certainly hope, that at this point, “You see you are Doomed in the Event of a Nuclear War.” To further my point, “Look at what happened in the Russian Chernobyl (Nuclear Plant) Disaster.” April 26, 1986 Level 7 (Maximum Severity) Nuclear Accident, “Killing untold scores of People.” This is, and was, “The Real Reason Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev (1990-1991) Dissolved His Communist Government,” called, “The Soviet Union.” President Gorbachev saw the Horror of the Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster, and Thought, “What if there were a Nuclear War,” between, “The East and West?” He (Gorbachev) concluded, “The World would be Destroyed,” and further, “This Madness (Insanity) had to End.”


    Gorbachev, the eighth and last leader of the Soviet Union was General Secretary of the Communist Party from 1985 until 1991 and leader of the Soviet Union from 1990 to 1991. Now 88, he is widely praised for preventing World War 3 and bringing an end to the Cold War through diplomacy with US President Ronald Reagan. On Monday, he appeared on a BBC Radio 4 show ahead of the 30th anniversary of the Berlin Wall’s collapse, where he warned the world is in “colossal danger” of nuclear wipeout. Provided by EXPRESS…

    Hence, “The Soviet Union (Communism) Ceased to Exist.” But Our Congress, Military, and Intelligence Agencies (17 Reported – Many Unknown) have “Failed to Tell American Citizens,” that, “Russia was No Longer a Communist Enemy of a Free Capitalist United States of America.”
    Yes, Russia has an agenda as a Nation. Most notably, “Russia,” became, “A CHRISTIAN NATION.”

    Either, “Change Your Thinking Towards Russia with the Current Cold War,” or “It shall Become Hot.” The Results of a Hot War (Nuclear – *Billions of People Shall Die) can be found in the Bible section called, “The Book of Revelation.”
    • This commment is unpublished.
      Charles Yearwood · 10 days ago
      Thomas, I agree with your post except for the line about Russia becoming Christian. The last generations of Russians who came up during the Soviet era claim they were better off under communism. Putin himself came out of the old KGB and has stated many times it was a mistake for the USSR to come to an end. Russians still have the deepest hatred for America to this day. Communism still exists and has been hiding in the closet in Russia since 1991. Russia still wants to destroy us and will not stop trying to do so.
  • This commment is unpublished.
    Paul Lambert · 10 days ago
    Just floating an idea here:

    It is ridiculous that the US and Russia should be such adversaries for any reason, but certainly for no reason but to cover the shame of a US welfare state gone amok. I am not sure I trust the Russians and perhaps they can't be good friends, but there is no need for them to be enemies.

    If indeed 85% of federal spending is on socialist redistributive programmes (read: legalised stealing committed by the very institutions ostensibly created to protect individuals' rights and property), then it would probably be enough simply to end these programs, either gradually or cold turkey.

    Having lived in a number of socialist countries myself, I have often heard the warnings of everything from "people will starve on the street" to "there will be bloody rebellion" any time one stupid socialist programme or another fails and the government has no choice but to discontinue it. None of those nightmare scenarios ever materialises. Instead, people who collect welfare (i.e., the where state pays you simply to be alive) simply continue working off the books as they always had while collecting extra welfare money, or they just go get jobs or side rackets. There are no more desperate people on the street than there were before. The only people on the street are the mental cases that were recklessly released from the madhouses if they simply promised to take their medication. The only violent turmoil on the streets is coming from fundamentalist Muslim jackasses who usually are collecting welfare money anyway.

    I have no reason to think the American experience would be any different. I think that aside from a few isolated incidents, all an end of the welfare state would mean is that Janiqua would have to braid a few more heads of hair during the week, and Dylon might finally put a ring on the finger of one of his babymamas and finally work with her to make a home and legitimise their spawn.

    I would prefer that to war.