Serious Military Activity Near U.S. Naval Submarine Antenna Array

Nation NewsDesk 24 January 2022 Hits: 41482

Very unusual military activity is taking place around the Jim Creek Naval Radio Station in Washington state; it's as if the US military is looking for a potential attacker off the coast. This Radio facility is the way the US Military communicates with ALL our submarines, even submerged, worldwide.

Comments

# doublebass3319 — doublebass3319 2022-01-27 18:19

NATO WANTS PEACE what do think jan 27...

+1 # Sun Tzu — Kevin 2022-01-25 12:36

Quotes:

It is more important to outhink your enemy, than to outfight him

All warfare is based on deception. Therefore, when capable, feign incapacity; when active, inactivity. When near, make it appear that you are far away; when far away, that you are to lure him; feign disorder and strike him. When he concentrates, prepare against him; where he is strong, avoid him. Anger his general and confuse him. Pretend inferiority and encourage his arrogance.

One need not destroy one's enemy. One need only destroy his willingness to engage.

If a battle can not be won do not fight it.

+2 # Maybe an underwater Chinese drone — Man of the Atom 2022-01-25 03:04

A bomb against the power supply would take out the entire transmitting station one would think. If a hot war breaks out that will be part of command and control and will see early destruction. If that station in Wisconsin was shut down, there is no backup - stupid! I do remember John Keel mentioning it in one of his books - the ELF (extra low frequency transmissions) created some odd effects in that area - some of them audio.

+3 # Meanwhile, over in Syria. — Rod Stirling 2022-01-24 23:32

The killer line "will now take place on a regular basis". Say what......

https://tass.com/defense/1392105

So let me see here, Iran cuts off Turkey's gas supply and now joint military patrols around Syria's borders, hmmmm.

Anyone here remember Lavrov and his deputies commenting that Russia will force the Empire to fold by "military and or technical means" as Russia deems necessary?

Does this mean the main show starts after Putin returns from the Olympic Games in Beijing, which is Feb 20?

+6 # Meanwhile out at sea — Rod Stirling 2022-01-24 22:10

Another F-35 crashes, this time into the deck........

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/f-35-stealth-jet-crashes-us-carrier-south-china-sea-7-injured

Grumman always said the Navy would rue the day they scrapped the Tomcat, and that is an under statement.

# RE: Serious Military Activity Near U.S. Naval Submarine Antenna Array — BeenThere 2022-01-24 21:07

The vc25a was more than likely just doing a check flight which is routine.

+5 # After 9-11... — Gulfcaptain 2022-01-24 20:37

I remember after 9-11, the US military went on a security blitz looking for "terrorists" under every rock. It is probably standard procedure to deploy assets that would be looking for any activity out of the ordinary. This does not mean that there is anything there to see. What is probably stationed and waiting are undersea assets just outside the international sea boarders. Russians don't need to intrude into US waters as they can sit and wait until called on. When these things launch, no target is outside their range. Again, I believe assets are already in place in most major cities, hidden and ready to go. So, all the defenses will be looking up when they should be looking down and why not? Hell the southern boarder is virtually wide open, anything could have come across the boarder over the past few years and no one would know about it. If these attacks happen, you can bet it was done intentionally by people inside our government who have sold our country out to foreign enemies and globalist policies. Don't think they would do it? Think again.

+6 # 12 miles to international border — oldschool 2022-01-24 22:28

That's right, Those Russian Subs or China's Subs can sit in the international waters (12 miles) out and no one can do anything about it. They could carpet bomb this country (with nuclear missiles) in a few short minutes if they chose to. Everyone has that opportunity to use International waters.

+5 # Oh,,, — oldschool 2022-01-24 22:41

And if this United States Woke Military want's to go out there and mess with-em. Go right on ahead. Let's See what happens.

# Boys in red heels on the deck — Jessiebeaner 2022-01-25 11:18

OMG……
But, that might be a good strategy……make the enemy laugh so hard they pee themselves, and while they all run to put on dry pants, the “woke” boys and girls, the trannies and LGBTQ personnel might have a chance of lobbing a few effective strikes, that is unless they are too busy being woke and doing all other manner of stuff not mentionable.

+8 # RE: Serious Military Activity Near U.S. Naval Submarine Antenna Array — Danfogle82 2022-01-24 18:26

As of 12 this afternoon I spotted a p8 running Chesapeake bay for almost a solid 4 hours. At one point a vc25a was airborne circling Andrew afb for about an hour around the same time. Shits getting screwy folks

+2 # Well. At least… — Gregg W 2022-01-24 22:14

They are doing something. If it were up to resident bite-me, everything would be shut down and sleeping.

Somebody is at least looking around and watching.

+8 # Good grief. — Rod Stirling 2022-01-24 16:48

Quote "The Flightaware24 web site" No Hal its flightradar24.com or flightaware.com .

Quote "This Radio facility is the way the US Military communicates with ALL our submarines, even submerged, worldwide". No Hal, first off VLF is only used for transmitting to submerged subs. there is NO two-way comms in VLF.

The Jim Creek facility's antenna array is known as a directional antenna array and therefore has limited coverage. It is designed for messaging US sub's of the Pacific Fleet. See here........

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Creek_Naval_Radio_Station

The US navy has another VLF transmitter for messaging US sub's at Exmouth in Western Australia. This transmitter uses an omni-directional antenna array for far greater coverage area at a lower power output........

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Communication_Station_Harold_E._Holt

# So, not much use for E.T. — carlireland34@gmail.com 2022-01-24 18:14

to phone home.
'Course now he could use a Samsung Galaxy like me :=))

+7 # Fascinating read. — Doug Brown 2022-01-24 16:40

Thank you Hal.

+9 # Old Equipment. — Doug Brown 2022-01-24 16:38

Our B-52's are 60 years old.
This important radio antenna is 60 years old.
Oh boy.

+1 # Older than that — Gregg W 2022-01-24 17:29

The radio station is 69 years old. Not to be petty.

That’s almost 70!

+3 # RE: Old Equipment. — iCanWalk 2022-01-24 16:43

Quoting Doug Brown:

Our B-52's are 60 years old.
This important radio antenna is 60 years old.
Oh boy.

And now with me...

that makes 3 of us. :-D

+5 # ¤¤¤¤ NOTICE ¤¤¤¤ — Palehorse 2022-01-24 16:37

|

¬ ¬ Russia Ukraine War Imminent ¬ ¬

¬ ¬ ¬ ¬ MONKEY WERX ¬ ¬ ¬ ¬

Premieres At 5:30 PM EST January 24, 2022

287 people waiting on-line as of now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6CTj5iInpE

+8 # Two best — Loki 2022-01-24 18:35

Hal Turner and Monkeywerx are two of the best informed sites online.

+6 # RE: ¤¤¤¤ NOTICE ¤¤¤¤ — abmermaid3 2022-01-24 18:14

Not sure why the down votes. Monkey is awesome!

+1 # Wisconsin — SBGlett77 2022-01-24 16:32

I had heard that the huge VLF array in Wisconsin, our backup that was laid out underground over hundreds of square miles, was closed about 25 years ago.

+6 # RE: Serious Military Activity Near U.S. Naval Submarine Antenna Array — RockyMountainBeerMan 2022-01-24 16:19

First time I've ever heard of this place. Sounds like a vulnerable single point of failure that should not be.

Better to have multiple locations. Redundancy and all that.

+2 # RE: Serious Military Activity Near U.S. Naval Submarine Antenna Array — RockyMountainBeerMan 2022-01-24 16:21

Thinking it may be a drill in anticipation of upcoming war.

# RE: Serious Military Activity Near U.S. Naval Submarine Antenna Array — Stefan123 2022-01-24 16:17

I checked and i see no mitary activity there.

+2 # RE: Serious Military Activity Near U.S. Naval Submarine Antenna Array — Willy Wonka 2022-01-24 16:08

Is the US this vulnerable? This seems like too easy of a thing to accomplish. It's crazy to think that all some country needs is the balls to launch an attack on the US mainland, and it will simply shut down the whole military.

+1 # RE: Serious Military Activity Near U.S. Naval Submarine Antenna Array — TexasWolf 2022-01-24 17:02

While I'm not sure an attack would shut down the entire military, it would certainly hurt the Navy. Which is probably the scariest branch an adversary can face. US Subs are quite good, and can deliver nukes from anywhere.

+2 # No 2nd, backup Naval Communication?? — cindy 2022-01-24 16:08

That’s not good, one would think that they would at least have some sort of back up communication center located a good distance from that one. Just saying.

+1 # "Scarey Thing Is" — t.n.kuss@hotmail.com 2022-01-24 16:06

Cripple this Facility "AND ALL NAVAL FLEET GO PREARRANGED HIGHEST ALERT6 WITH CONTROLS ELIMINATED!" My point? Anything could go wrong once "ALL WEAPONS COCKED AND LOCKED ON THEIR INDIVIDUAL OWN."

+8 # If this is Russia or China — Booskybobcat 2022-01-24 15:58

then taking out this facility is very smart. They must know that one of our major advantages vs them is our submarines and making them blind would be a big blow.

+12 # Please let them hit Bill Gates' house... — iCanWalk 2022-01-24 15:51

before responding in kind.

+5 # RE: Please let them hit Bill Gates' house... — Gunner 2022-01-24 16:01

That creep is deep in hiding on the other damn side of the world most likely but I agree he absolutely deserves to HANG!!!

+5 # RE: Serious Military Activity Near U.S. Naval Submarine Antenna Array — Lambs Servant 2022-01-24 15:47

Something could be up. False flag?

Refresh comments list
RSS feed for comments to this post

JComments

by sur.ly

100% Trusted Informational Platform Website 2021

Translate

Nation

Serious Military Activity Near U.S. Naval Submarine Antenna Array

Comments

About