Translate

English English
en Englishaf Afrikaanssq Shqipar العربيةhy Հայերենbe Беларуская моваbg Българскиca Catalàzh-CN 简体中文zh-TW 繁體中文hr Hrvatskics Čeština‎da Dansknl Nederlandset Eestitl Filipinofi Suomifr Françaisgl Galegoka ქართულიde Deutschel Ελληνικάiw עִבְרִיתhi हिन्दीhu Magyaris Íslenskaid Bahasa Indonesiaga Gaeligeit Italianoja 日本語ko 한국어ku كوردی‎lv Latviešu valodalt Lietuvių kalbamk Македонски јазикms Bahasa Melayuno Norsk bokmålfa فارسیpl Polskipt Portuguêspa ਪੰਜਾਬੀru Русскийgd Gàidhligsr Српски језикsk Slovenčinasl Slovenščinaes Españolsv Svenskatr Türkçeuk Українськаur اردو

Nation

U.S. Supreme Court DENIES Brunson Case

Nation Hits: 10946
U.S. Supreme Court DENIES Brunson Case

The United States Supreme Court has DENIED a petition for a Writ of Certiorari in the Brunson case.  As such, the court WILL NOT hear the case involving the fraudulent 2020 election, and the illegitimate President it installed.

Did you __really__ think the fabulously corrupt federal courts would save the nation?   Ha!

 

Comments   

+1 # Curb stomping a dead horse. — SalmonQueen 2023-01-10 22:13
So what about the similarity with E-Merica and Brazil? Same machines, same fraud. And media cover up. Only they have millions protesting and the military on they’re side. The alphabet American 3 letter folks helping the opposing side. It’s same situation we’re in only more visible because of peaceful protests. I think we’re doing a media blackout for the most part because it would make the USA take a look at its own elections. Since Brandon took office we have been in operation destroy our country and kill as many Vets, people with Pensions, and our economy.
# https://pacificlegal.org/what-is-a-writ-of-certiorari/ — Jdr211971 2023-01-10 13:59
https://pacificlegal.org/what-is-a-writ-of-certiorari/
# Are you sure you're right? — Jdr211971 2023-01-10 13:58
A Writ of Certiorari means the court WILL hear the case, from my understanding.
# █▓▒░ Writ of Certiorari ░▒▓█ — Palehorse 2023-01-10 21:09
|

“...writ of certiorari.”

This is a request that the Supreme Court order a lower court
to send up the record of the case for review.

The Court usually is not under any obligation to hear these cases,
and it usually only does so if the case could have national significance,

https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/supreme-1
-5 # There Is No U-Turn — Dolph 2023-01-10 10:19
Palehorse (Death) says, "the rapture occurs the moment Jesus returns at the Battle of Armageddon." This makes no common sense because the Church returns with Christ to fight with Him at the Battle of Armageddon. Palehorse's explanation suggests the Church does a U-turn in the sky when Christ returns.

Palepony also does a slight of hand by leaving off the end of I Thes.4:17, ...to meet the Lord in the air "AND SO SHALL WE EVER BE WITH THE LORD". How can we ever be with the Lord if He is coming down when we are going up!!

Thirdly, he says there is only one resurrection when all Bible students know there are two: The resurrection of the just and the resurrection of the unjust which occurs at the end of the millennium, the 1,000 year reign of Christ.

BTW, the first resurrection includes 5 raptures: Christ, the first fruits, who rises with the O.T. saints; the rapture of the Church before God's wrath; the rapture of the 144,000 in Rev. C.13; the rapture of the two witnesses and lastly the rapture of the Tribulation saints.

This post was misplaced and was a reply to Palehorse's post down below.
+1 # █▓▒░ Stupidity Beyond Repair ░▒▓█ — Palehorse 2023-01-10 18:59
|

First you insist that we need to cancel Thanksgiving dinner
because your sorceress “prophetess,” Vicky Parnell, says your
“rapture” will happen first. And you were dead serious.

Now you have “5” raptures.

What is wrong with you?
You are mentally unstable.

Go away.
+1 # American Bar Association — Marlena 2023-01-10 09:25
British Accreditation Registry--a system of legal conformity enforcement in historic England. It has been extended to all Commonwealth nations, including the U.S. This has extended the reach of the Crown into all the colonies. It has usurped The U.S. Constitution, while pretending to abide by it. The BAR Association controls the precursors to our legal profession and thus to the decisions of our courts. The ABA must be rooted out, just as the AMA must be rooted out, and for the same reasons.
-1 # RE: U.S. Supreme Court DENIES Brunson Case — Woulf 2023-01-10 03:47
RED
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1245526/
"Old man my a**".
# RE: U.S. Supreme Court DENIES Brunson Case — Brianroy 2023-01-10 03:29
Kari Lake, HAD SHE FILED AT SCOTUS, would be having the 2022 Case heard right now as she has ARTICLE III STANDING TO SUE:
1) Baker v. Carr 369 U.S. 186 (1962) @ 204, 208
2) United States v. SCRAP 412 U.S. 669 (1973) @ 471-474, 476
3) Whitmore v. Arkansas 495 U.S. 149 (1990) @ 154-155
4) Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife 504 U.S. 555 (1992) @ 560-561, 574-578
5) Northeastern Fla. Chapter, Associated Gen. Contractors of America v. Jacksonville 508 U.S. 656 (1993) @ 663-664
6) Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona 520 U.S. 43 (1997) @ 64
7) Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States ex rel. Stevens 529 U.S. 765 (2000) @ 771-773

Were it Trump under the right mechanisms, he could have sued and won, but his attorneys intentionally BOTCHED IT.
At a Harvard University 09-28-2005 Q & A Session, Justice Breyer described the Supreme Court’s role as “100 percent law interpretation” and “much more mechanical than you might think.” Does Raland Brunson, who is NOT a member of Congress, who has no injury from election to office against him in the 2020 election have Article III standing? As we read what cases the SCOTUS cites, the answer is NO.

Baker v. Carr 369 U.S. 186
(1962) @204,208

(Especially 208 allows a straight shot to SCOTUS)

@204 "Have the appellants alleged such a personal stake in the outcome of the controversy as to assure that concrete adverseness which sharpens the presentation of issues upon which the court so largely depends for illumination of difficult constitutional
questions? This is the gist of the question of standing. It is, of course, a
question of federal law."
@208 " A citizen's right to a vote free of arbitrary impairment by state action has been
judicially recognized as a right secured by the Constitution when such
impairment resulted from dilution by a false tally, cf. United States v.
Classic, 313 U. S. 299; or by a refusal to count votes from arbitrarily selected
precincts, cf. United States v. Mosley, 238 U. S. 383, or by a stuffing of the
ballot box, cf. Ex parte Siebold, 100 U. S. 371; United States v. Saylor, 322
U. S. 385."

" "The very essence of civil liberty certainly consists in the right of every individual to claim the protection of the laws, whenever he receives an injury." Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 5 U. S. 163. "
# SCOTUS Traitors — Shadesofgreen 2023-01-10 13:36
The Brunson Brother's case of Brunson vs Adams were interviewed today and told by the Justices that the Executive Branch and Legislative Branches of Government are independent and Sovereign from the people's claims of Liberty and Injury.

This means that the Justices believe we are not a Republic in which is a state of which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch.


Whom are the President and Congressmen/Women Sovereign to?

This is an unbelievable hearing by the Justices.

Are they actually saying that our government is controlled by foreign Powers? Let me guess ENGLAND?

Again is our Executive Branch and Legislative branch usurped by a Monarchy?

This is outstanding rejection of the highest Courts of a FAKE GOVERNMENT including the Judicial Branch.

Nothing but LIES!

Can ANYONE explain to me whom are OUR SO CALLED LEADERS SOVEREIGN TO?
# They hurried the paperwork along for a Jan. 6th hearing date. — MissinD60s 2023-01-09 21:13
They wanted to encite a revolt. They're complicit w/the DS TREASONOUS TRASH. I only know of two SCOTUS justices that will escape the noose: Thomas n Alito. The others will stand trial for their crimes.
# RE: They hurried the paperwork along for a Jan. 6th hearing date. — JFY 2023-01-09 22:34
.
What court will they stand trial in? The Supreme Court? Some court of the international Beast system like the Hague? The UN? Seriously.

The only court they will eventually stand trial in is in the afterlife, where it will be between them and God, and that will do absolutely nothing for those of us who are still in the here and now.
# Hitler n his buddies probably said the same thing. — MissinD60s 2023-01-10 12:27
We're in unprecedented times. Most of the elite will not scape justice for the worst genocide in human history. Many will die at our hands. ALL will answer at The Judgement. That includes seven SCOTUS justices who just aided Satan.
+1 # RE: U.S. Supreme Court DENIES Brunson Case — NDAlphaMale 2023-01-09 20:37
Wait…no 4d chess moves?
+6 # Off Comment - First experience — Uasns 2023-01-09 20:10
This weekend, I encountered a general neutral bathroom. I had to pee, and I was suspicious of who in the shoes in the stall beside me. I did not like it. Turned out it was another woman. Whew
At the mall, a 60+ man was washing up in another 'gender neutral washroom where a 16 year old giel had to go. I did not like it.

I noticed a she-male using the ladies, I did not like it. Call me old fashioned, call me traditional.

I do not like gender neutral bathrooms, I do not like them, not one bit.
# RE: Off Comment - First experience — Adster 2023-01-10 07:29
Personally i believe they should all be held against their will in a mental institution, and receive psychological help with the right medication
+2 # RE: Off Comment - First experience — selah 2023-01-09 21:07
I do not like them with a mouse
I do not like them here or there
I do not like them anywhere

Lol ok uasns, I mean dr Seuss, lol
+1 # Not surprised — Erfman 2023-01-09 19:56
There are certain things the Supreme Court will not look at because they know what the outcome would be and they don't want to go there.

As it is, everyone treats them with the highest respect and admiration.

They like the accolades and power.

Why would they break open this hornets nest and put themselves in such an awkwardly situation.

By not hearing the case they avoid the headaches and they still get paid the same amount.
+1 # US Republic — nTrudr65 2023-01-09 19:49
It’s gone

What we gonna do about it?
+1 # Hal is correct. — mordecai.jeremiah@startmail.com 2023-01-09 19:38
Here is the scotus website for this case
Petition denied.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html
+1 # these people are infuckinsane — selah 2023-01-09 18:59
https://nypost.com/2023/01/09/biden-administration-reportedly-weighing-national-ban-on-gas-stoves/
+2 # RE: U.S. Supreme Court DENIES Brunson Case — Sgrant 2023-01-09 18:56
Imagine my shock.
+1 # Re: Supreme Court case — Jerry33058 2023-01-09 18:36
My mistake, I didn't read the whole article. You were right.
-2 # Re: Supreme Court case — Jerry33058 2023-01-09 18:27
Hal, Can you confirm this? Over on standeyo.com they have an article that says the Brunson case was accepted.
# Nada — selah 2023-01-09 18:36
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/01/us-supreme-court-also-decides-not-look-mail-ballot-bonner-case/
-2 # RE: U.S. Supreme Court DENIES Brunson Case — SeymourInSedona 2023-01-09 17:50
i respect Hal Turner a great deal

but the comments sections is like a portal into Hell.............there's nothing he can do about it but i am aware of this fact ....
# Portal — Woulf 2023-01-10 03:25
This portal is a "hall of mirrors". "Look close, look deep". What is it "that stares back at you"?
Men At Work - Overkill (Video Version)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RY7S6EgSlCI
# RE: U.S. Supreme Court DENIES Brunson Case — JFY 2023-01-09 22:25
.
So what would be your idea of a heavenly "Seymour Approved" type of comment? Please give us an example.

Or if you prefer, what type of comments are on your "No No" list?
-1 # Nope — gjones7777 2023-01-09 21:34
Like what gooberoo????
# "It's Not Their Flaunt" — t.n.kuss@hotmail.com 2023-01-09 17:47
I read and saw a "WHISTLE BLOWER VIDEO WHO STATED TO SECURE A POWERFUL POLITICAL POSITION YOU HAD TO RAPE A LITTLE BOY OR GIRL THEN KILL THEM ON VIDEO SO YOU COULD NEVER BETRAY THOSE IN TRUE POWER OR OTHERS IN THE SAME BOAT AS YOURSELF." Thus the "SPECIAL HAND PICKED JUSTICES HAVE VERY LITTLE CHOICE BUT TO DO WHAT THEY'RE TOLD."

And yes, "THE SAME GOES FOR CONGRESS."
# Woulves — Woulf 2023-01-10 03:39
Whom is it that circles, watches, and waits. Looking at the "ways in and out" and "seeing" where the "party favors" need to be left.
What was it they always say, the "patient hunter" always "gets the prey"?
+1 # fabulously corrupt... — WilliamtheResolute 2023-01-09 17:14
What an eloquent way of calling a turd and turd.
# Yes — Woulf 2023-01-10 03:32
But some come with the "extra sauce".
+1 # cowards — cowgirl 2023-01-09 17:09
paid off cowards.
+2 # chaos — BilboFraggins 2023-01-09 16:17
i swear they are looking for people to riot. Love to see the end over the horizon...
+1 # RE: U.S. Supreme Court DENIES Brunson Case — RAFO 2023-01-09 16:10
And did anyone REALLY think Chief Justice Roberts would allow this to be heard?? If so, you’re living in la-la land. The usurpation continues…

It should be obvious to all by now there IS NO recourse to this travesty through the courts. Probably not even in Arizona. They’re stuck with Hobbs and company… unless they go Brazilian.
-3 # I just got me a Green Machine! — MildB 2023-01-09 15:45
~
I will let ya all know.

If the grid goes down I have back up.

https://ubco.com/collections/shop-ubco-products/products/2x2-work-bike
+2 # Really??? — gjones7777 2023-01-09 21:38
Look at meeee I'm a prepper...I have an electric bike for when the ELECTRIC grid goes down......really? Wowzers
-1 # RE: Really??? — Woulf 2023-01-10 03:56
"Points" for "sarcasm". Anyone else?
-2 # I bet it el — MildB 2023-01-09 17:32
~
Do 50 when I'm done with er, lol.
+1 # REID V. COVERT — Jdr211971 2023-01-09 15:43
There remains the question of how the Treaty Clause comports with the rest of the system of enumerated and separated powers. Missouri v. Holland (1920) suggests that the Treaty Clause permits treaties to be made on subjects that would go beyond the powers otherwise enumerated for the federal government in the Constitution. In Reid v. Covert (1957), however, the Court held that treaties may not violate the individual rights provisions of the Constitution.

There remains the question of how the Treaty Clause comports with the rest of the system of enumerated and separated powers. Missouri v. Holland (1920) suggests that the Treaty Clause permits treaties to be made on subjects that would go beyond the powers otherwise enumerated for the federal government in the Constitution. In Reid v. Covert (1957), however, the Court held that treaties may not violate the individual rights provisions of the Constitution.

https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/articles/article-ii/clauses/346

Question: Wouldn't this apply to protection of our Constitutional rights? Someone with more legal knowledge please answer this if you can.
# Yep — Woulf 2023-01-10 04:02
It is called "natural law". Even a mouse has the right to "fight to the death" to "live".
When "laws" are given by "precedent" and not "reason"? BS.
+7 # Wake up folks !!! — tamtamtx55 2023-01-09 15:38
There IS NO MORE JUSTICE.All these so called investigation are a load of Crap to keep us dosil. We all need to ask ourselves what is our Red line?
+4 # Not even the court is with the people — Chappyusa1 2023-01-09 15:36
We all knew this will not go anywhere. Even if they had 10,000 pieces of evidence proving it was stolen (and I believe there that much out there, if not more), they will still not hear, nor lift a finger to do or say anything against it. Truly there is not part of government on the people's side anymore. They are all globalist now, sold out, or compromised.

Truly we are one our own.
+3 # Gross dereliction of duty — Smiley1984*! 2023-01-09 15:35
It is incumbent upon the court to serve justice to all without FEAR or FAVOUR, not to do so is, in my view, gross dereliction of duty.

When in a free democratic society justice is not served by the authorised court, then it must be served by some other means.

A country that does not have EQUAL justice for all; is neither free or democratic, it is an bureaucratic tyranny!
# RE: U.S. Supreme Court DENIES Brunson Case — Eddamnit 2023-01-09 15:12
Stop worshiping the government as your god.
# RE: U.S. Supreme Court DENIES Brunson Case — selah 2023-01-09 19:07
who is your God?
# RE: U.S. Supreme Court DENIES Brunson Case — JFY 2023-01-09 15:19
.
What would give you the idea that anyone is doing that here?
-5 # Hello from Mike Lindell, — MildB 2023-01-09 14:56
~
Interesting news is coming out of Maricopa County!

A new investigation into the computer issues surrounding election complaints is underway. This was one of the biggest stories of election fraud that happened during the 2022 general election. Everyone watched as the machines were failing! We also saw the Maricopa County election board declare that there was nothing to see! Just a normal everyday issue that happens all the time! Except it doesn’t.

Why the flip flop now? Is this a sincere effort or a cover up? 

“Maricopa County says a former Arizona Supreme Court chief justice will lead an investigation into printer issues that caused problems for some voters on Election Day.”

https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/2022-election-maricopa-county-launches-independent-investigation-into-printer-issues?trk_msg=6LNUSH6NK9AKD8HKA11UCOP4EO&trk_contact=MQHPERSIQHQ6NKVQTNO7LL7SDK&trk_sid=MHU7HV92F748P2EAD1IK2IP3UK&trk_link=8GSL2F1IFHEKJ45TT3GVH45HE0 

read here: 2022 Election: Maricopa County launches independent investigation into printer issues (fox10phoenix.com)
-1 # RE: Hello from Mike Lindell, — Woulf 2023-01-10 04:08
Band Of The Hand
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxGzJQV1MI0
Byte me.
+4 # RE: Hello from Mike Lindell, — JFY 2023-01-09 15:03
.
Honestly, it's almost a sure bet: read Hal's article above and apply it to the case you mention.

Wash, rinse, repeat.
-7 # I know. — MildB 2023-01-09 15:11
~
Here watch this,
https://darkagedefender.com/watch/taliban
3 2 1.
LOL! Did you see/feel and not reason? You let your feelings direct your next action.

So did a dear friend of mine who sent me this.

There was some truth in this but IF you keep your whits, just maybe you have what it takes inside already. Inside your Heart.

It is Gods will that WE BE LAWFUL and JUST!
# And — Woulf 2023-01-10 04:14
How many times where we told to go against a city? To "burn it" to "the ground" and to take "nothing" of the "accursed thing"
+1 # RE: U.S. Supreme Court DENIES Brunson Case — JFY 2023-01-09 14:53
.
Well what an enormous surprise; who would have ever thought that the Supreme Court (you know, the one that sided with the usurper-in-thief and the cackling hyena from day one), would reject a case against the illegitimate acting government that they helped install in power? Yet again. I mean, it's not like they didn't do it over and over again during the last 2 years. Why would it have been different this time?

Hopefully this will finally wake the cluck up all the Qtards except the most irretrievably lost that were still saying at this late date that "this was finally it" and that trump would finally come out of the shadows with his red cape flying in the wind to save everyone without a single shot being fired, etc., etc.

Okay, now can we accept that God only helps those who help themselves? No one else is coming. Unless you consider possibly the People's Liberation Army (i.e. communist china) as some sort of help, which most sane persons wouldn't.

From Hal's previous article about the World Hell Organization, the world only has 4 months to get its act together and stop this crap before it stops us. Forever.
-4 # UPDATES: — MildB 2023-01-09 15:02
The Kari Lake Appeal has been filed, it was submitted to the Supreme court and the Arizona Supreme Court has not bounced it back to the Appeals court. More coming on that!

While other law firms are backing away from this incredible lift, the Lindell Legal Offense fund is staying the course! With this new information and more “misconduct” committed by election officials, federal agencies, and Kati Hobbs herself, we cannot walk away from this effort. In fact, we are doubling down.

We know how to fight this battle; we know how to win. Our team has been working for over 2 years litigating and learning how these battles are won. We will not stop!

A personal note: As you have witnessed this past 3 years, I am all in to save our country from selections, where bad actors are being chosen to rule over us. They don’t seem to have our best interest in mind, and we are seeing the impact on every level of government. I want you to know, I am running for RNC chairman to drain the swamp and implement real solutions to restore our elections. We cannot allow the selection of our representatives anymore. This is the biggest issue facing our country and we must fix it NOW. I told you I would give everything I have and do whatever it takes to save our country. With God’s help, I intend to do just that.

God bless, 
Mike Lindell
Lindell Legal Offense Fund

P.S. -- Please watch this video and circulate it widely-- Americans like you and I don't deserve to have the FBI harass us because we are challenging election integrity! It’s time for accountability!

https://frankspeech.com/video/fbi-lindell-raid-hardees?trk_msg=6LNUSH6NK9AKD8HKA11UCOP4EO&trk_contact=MQHPERSIQHQ6NKVQTNO7LL7SDK&trk_sid=MHU7HV92F748P2EAD1IK2IP3UK&trk_link=CVR24QF680IKLAPPCIN81LF1NS
-6 # The Lord will have them — MildB 2023-01-09 14:39
~
@ derision now.

Psalms 2:4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the LORD shall have them in derision.

Psalms 59:8 But thou, O LORD, shalt laugh at them; thou shalt have all the heathen in derision.

Sign: The KJV
-2 # RE: U.S. Supreme Court DENIES Brunson Case — hws 2023-01-09 14:34
Jetzt bleibt nur das Militär
+3 # RE: U.S. Supreme Court DENIES Brunson Case — JFY 2023-01-09 15:00
.
The military are as compromised and as treasonous as the supreme court.

There is no one left in the structure of power to help the people regain their freedom. It's that simple. Probably not even at the State level.

The only thing that one can believe from the Federal Government is when they tell you that they're coming to either take you away, or to kill you.
+4 # Please Realize.. — gpfla 2023-01-09 14:11
..
All presidents have been and shall be PUPPETS. Yes, all includes Trump.

End of story.
+4 # █▓▒░ Court DENIES ░▒▓█ — Palehorse 2023-01-09 13:49
|

For this lawlessness is already at work secretly,
and it will remain secret until the one who is
holding it back steps out of the way.
2 Thessalonians 2:7
-5 # That be — MildB 2023-01-09 14:42
~
THE RESTRAINER OF EVIL!

THE HOLY SPIRIT!

Sign: The Harpazo Event
-6 # Sorry.. — Dolph 2023-01-09 17:31
The restrainer is the Church. The Holy Spirit is not absent during the Tribulation because millions will be saved during those seven years.

When the Spirit-filled Church is raptured evil will have no restraint and all Hell will brake out.

Are you born again? Led by the Spirit of God? The Church is not subject to the wrath of God. Pray you will be able to escape all these things coming upon the Earth, Luke 21:36.
-2 # █▓▒░ Sorry... ░▒▓█ — Palehorse 2023-01-09 21:31
|

The restrainer is the Archangel Michael.
The deceived pre-trib rapture cult will claim the restrainer
is the church which is absolutely a lie, as America for
instance, is the daughter of Babylon. The Church is full of
adultery, fornication, greed, LBGTQ sodomites, and
more. The weak church cannot withhold Satan, but the
Archangel Michael can.

After Michael is removed as the restrainer, Satan controls the
anti-Christ and...

“It was granted to him to make war with the saints and to
overcome them.”
Revelation 13:7

The rapture occurs the moment Jesus returns during the battle of the
Apocalypse (Apocalypse means “revealing”) …

No pre-trib Rapture

“ And the dead in Christ will rise first. 17 Then we who are alive 
and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds
to meet the Lord in the air.
1 Thessalonians 4:16-17

There is only 1 harvest.
-2 # Sorry... — Dolph 2023-01-10 10:27
There Is No U-Turn —
Palehorse (Death) says, "the rapture occurs the moment Jesus returns at the Battle of Armageddon." This makes no common sense because the Church returns with Christ to fight with Him at the Battle of Armageddon. Palehorse's explanation suggests the Church does a U-turn in the sky when Christ returns.

Palepony also does a slight of hand by leaving off the end of I Thes.4:17, ...to meet the Lord in the air "AND SO SHALL WE EVER BE WITH THE LORD". How can we ever be with the Lord if He is coming down when we are going up!!

Thirdly, he says there is only one resurrection when all Bible students know there are two: The resurrection of the just and the resurrection of the unjust which occurs at the end of the millennium, the 1,000 year reign of Christ.

BTW, the first resurrection includes 5 raptures: Christ, the first fruits, who rises with the O.T. saints; the rapture of the Church before God's wrath; the rapture of the 144,000 in Rev. C.13; the rapture of the two witnesses and lastly the rapture of the Tribulation saints.
-1 # █▓▒░ Sorry to see you have little understanding of the Bible ░▒▓█ — Palehorse 2023-01-10 18:03
|

Absolute heresy. Look how demented the pre-trib cult has become.
Now there is “5 raptures.”

There is no response to someone who is this corrupted with the scriptures.
There is no response to someone who is this corrupted with the scriptures.

Must have eaten too much turkey while being raptured with Vicky
Parnell before Thanksgiving, as Dolph professed. (And you want us to
read more of your lies and deceit?)

And never forget, the pre- tribulation rapture was never heard of, in the
entire world and throughout history, until it was introduced by the
occultist John Nelson Darby in the early 1800's.

Dolph is a dupe clown.


Kali K has it correct.
+1 # I Believe Jesus — Kali K 2023-01-10 11:32
I'm going to believe what Jesus said:

29 Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:

30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.

31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.

Read the first part of Matthew 24 for 'which tribulation.' It's in Mark as well. People can speculate all they want but I'm going with what the Lord, Himself, said.
# I Believe... Yes — Dolph 2023-01-10 22:15
Jesus is talking to the Jews about gathering His Jewish elect and separating the tares from the wheat. See Math.13:38-50. The whole Olivet Discourse is about Christ's second coming, not the rapture because the Church does not yet exist at this point in time. See 2Thes.1:7-10; Dt.30:4; Isa.11:11-12. There is a "gathering" of the Jews at the end of the tribulation. This is not a rapture and says nothing of a rapture
-2 # RE: U.S. Supreme Court DENIES Brunson Case — Grizcon 2023-01-09 13:48
Goddamn this country. As soon as that Russia sends us back to the fucking Stone Age the better. Todd is goddamn rich elite cheating and getting their ways. Time for them to fucking burn
+5 # RE: U.S. Supreme Court DENIES Brunson Case — MSNews 2023-01-09 13:47
Well the black robed demons definately are very consistent when it comes to denying the Constitutional rights to legal Americans.

FU SCOTUS
# Jakes — Shadesofgreen 2023-01-09 13:44
Oh well this only means that a wrath of God similar to when Moses parted the Red Sea event will happen soon (earthquake before winter is over).

Watch out because I’m sure God is angry that the devil took control of the 2020 election and kicked out the last good Presidents remaining.
+2 # Keep in mind — gjones7777 2023-01-09 13:48
It's impossible to surprise God
# Jakes — Shadesofgreen 2023-01-09 13:56
God must of allowed it only because he is picking his target for the right moment.

Pay Back is a bitch when you have God as picking the target.
+5 # The Q crowd is trying to spin this defeat — Booskybobcat 2023-01-09 13:39
dont worry it will all work out, they will get justice keep the faith. What is it going to take for people to realize that unless the populous mobilizes against the globalists in defiance then nothing will happen, theres no grand plan theres no white hats controlling things. God has turned his back on the United States, our gov is evil, our population seems to embrace much of it and we are coming under judgment.
-2 # There Is No Political Answer... — Dolph 2023-01-09 17:38
...to a spiritual question. How many of you have been conned by the antichrist news media and believe in evolution?

Only a fool says in their heart there is no God. You don't like the Jews but you follow them like an ignorant sheeple to the slaughter.
-2 # RE: The Q crowd is trying to spin this defeat — DonS 2023-01-09 15:47
Quoting MildB:
~
Interesting news is coming out of Maricopa County!

A new investigation into the computer issues surrounding election complaints is underway. This was one of the biggest stories of election fraud that happened during the 2022 general election. Everyone watched as the machines were failing! We also saw the Maricopa County election board declare that there was nothing to see! Just a normal everyday issue that happens all the time! Except it doesn’t.

Why the flip flop now? Is this a sincere effort or a cover up? 

“Maricopa County says a former Arizona Supreme Court chief justice will lead an investigation into printer issues that caused problems for some voters on Election Day.”

https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/2022-election-maricopa-county-launches-independent-investigation-into-printer-issues?trk_msg=6LNUSH6NK9AKD8HKA11UCOP4EO&trk_contact=MQHPERSIQHQ6NKVQTNO7LL7SDK&trk_sid=MHU7HV92F748P2EAD1IK2IP3UK&trk_link=8GSL2F1IFHEKJ45TT3GVH45HE0 

read here: 2022 Election: Maricopa County launches independent investigation into printer issues (fox10phoenix.com)

Quoting Booskybobcat:
dont worry it will all work out, they will get justice keep the faith. What is it going to take for people to realize that unless the populous mobilizes against the globalists in defiance then nothing will happen, theres no grand plan theres no white hats controlling things. God has turned his back on the United States, our gov is evil, our population seems to embrace much of it and we are coming under judgment.




Well said..Amen!
# RE: The Q crowd is trying to spin this defeat — DonS 2023-01-09 15:47
Quoting MildB:
~
Interesting news is coming out of Maricopa County!

A new investigation into the computer issues surrounding election complaints is underway. This was one of the biggest stories of election fraud that happened during the 2022 general election. Everyone watched as the machines were failing! We also saw the Maricopa County election board declare that there was nothing to see! Just a normal everyday issue that happens all the time! Except it doesn’t.

Why the flip flop now? Is this a sincere effort or a cover up? 

“Maricopa County says a former Arizona Supreme Court chief justice will lead an investigation into printer issues that caused problems for some voters on Election Day.”

https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/2022-election-maricopa-county-launches-independent-investigation-into-printer-issues?trk_msg=6LNUSH6NK9AKD8HKA11UCOP4EO&trk_contact=MQHPERSIQHQ6NKVQTNO7LL7SDK&trk_sid=MHU7HV92F748P2EAD1IK2IP3UK&trk_link=8GSL2F1IFHEKJ45TT3GVH45HE0 

read here: 2022 Election: Maricopa County launches independent investigation into printer issues (fox10phoenix.com)

Quoting Booskybobcat:
dont worry it will all work out, they will get justice keep the faith. What is it going to take for people to realize that unless the populous mobilizes against the globalists in defiance then nothing will happen, theres no grand plan theres no white hats controlling things. God has turned his back on the United States, our gov is evil, our population seems to embrace much of it and we are coming under judgment.




Well said..Amen!
+7 # RE: U.S. Supreme Court DENIES Brunson Case — paulattahoe 2023-01-09 13:04
Why would a court with a majority as corrupt and illegitimate as Joe Biden take on election fraud?

The four leftist Justices seem to be reinforced by Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh in ruling against the opportunity for the American people to finally hear the truth about the rampant 2020 election fraud.

I'm afraid the final solution to taking voting rights away from the American people will be violence.
# We can't sue ourselves out of a communist coup d'etat with crooked judges/courts. — watchmann 2023-01-09 17:27
We can't vote ourselves out of a communist coup d'etat with rigged elections.

We can't sue ourselves out of a communist coup d'etat with crooked judges/courts.


http://www.voterig.com/votenowork.jpg

https://obamaninjas.com/imgs/pg/119.o1.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ez2pfCmWEAMjLk8.jpg

https://offbeatquotes.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/gtn0ssdse5h21-1.jpg

http://emilysquotes.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/EmilysQuotes.Com-injustice-law-resistance-duty-Thomas-Jefferson.jpg

https://quotefancy.com/media/wallpaper/800x450/4683118-Thomas-Jefferson-Quote-The-tree-of-liberty-must-be-refreshed-from.jpg

https://thefederalistpapers.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/a_free_people_ought_not_only_be_armed_disciplined_but_they_should_have_sufficient_arms_and_ammunition.jpg

You do you have one Right remaining: The 2nd Amendment Right.

Our Founding Fathers KNEW we would NEED it.

Americans have Billions of Guns an Ammo for just such a purpose.

https://media.patriots.win/post/87adOMWe.jpeg
+4 # Wow — rogue_ 2023-01-09 13:00
I'm really not surprised. I guess I'm done voting. What's the point?
+4 # Point of voting? — joe@tittiger.com 2023-01-09 13:07
.
The point of voting from the beginning was to placate you and make you think that you had some input when you never really have.

Everything they told you was a lie. Ever wonder why you never heard of Lysander Sooner in government schools.
Perhaps because he was warning you about these things....

https://i.imgur.com/BKtpyoW.jpg
-1 # Yes — Woulf 2023-01-10 04:42
But it means you tried "peace first", and "war" second.
-1 # RE: Point of voting? — JFY 2023-01-09 15:08
.
Spooner.
+2 # STUDY SOME REAL HISTORY — joe@tittiger.com 2023-01-09 12:43
.
My study of the Supreme Court reveals that it has been involved in power grab after power grab. It fabricated its. Power of judicial supremacy. It hears cases that the States have jurisdiction over,

In all is is a globalist tool to trample the Constitution.
They even recently murdered a Supreme Court Justice.
-1 # RE: STUDY SOME REAL HISTORY — Woulf 2023-01-10 05:49
"THEY" wanted "more than that". "THEY" got stopped "short".
+2 # Independent Supreme Court — TC 2023-01-09 12:32
It is impossible to have an independent Supreme Court if the government refuses to do its duty to protect them.
+2 # SCOTUS SCAM — zoochman 2023-01-09 12:31
I maintain that the Courts may not even be able to entertain all the cases brought or attempted to be brought before them. Unfortunately, with "electronic signatures," ink stamps and typed signatures, there is really no way to know whether any case has actually been brought for any court's consideration. The cases maybe censored by clerks, NWO operatives, or deep state agents as check points to any actually decision on a case. If the justices were to require a signature by their hand, that would leave some certainty they reached a decision whether by a gun to the head, a threat or their intent, ill or otherwise. May God have mercy on us all.
# And The Beat Goes On — itsme 2023-01-09 12:22
Kool-Aid anyone
+4 # Same with BO — LegionPrime67 2023-01-09 12:05
Same evil wouldn't hear any evidence that BO is a Kenyan. Of course we weren't holding our breath on this one... They all have an agenda to roll out.
We are on a 2 year countdown to 80% of us dead by 2025, see Deagel and GA Guidestones if you don't know what I'm referring to.
-1 # RE: Same with BO — Woulf 2023-01-10 04:58
There are still "pics" I want to hear the "explanation" for. Some are "really interesting".
# Correct sir — gjones7777 2023-01-09 13:47
And the score is 1006 them, zero us
+16 # Steve Quayle — rogerhelmich 2023-01-09 12:05
Hal as your good friend has said for over two decades, "There is not a Political Solution for a spiritual problem." We have the leaders we deserve.
-1 # No — Woulf 2023-01-10 05:57
We have the leaders "we have allowed".
Maybe someone should put some "blood in that mud" and "realize" life is a b*tch.
+4 # this is it, totally agree — Booskybobcat 2023-01-09 13:40
and we have not repented of our wicked ways and humbled ourselves before the Lord so our land is NOT being healed.
+1 # Brunson case... — J Grayman 2023-01-09 12:00
Article:
The Truth About the Brunson Case
By Adam Carter / Tracy Beanz
December 30, 2022

Quote: "Sadly, there are people out there who will exploit, profit from, or simply “grift” off that desperation by filling the need with false hope—or “hopium.” It appears, unfortunately, that Brunson v. Alma S. Adams; et al. (No. 22-380)—also known as “The Brunson Case”—pending before the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS), is just such an example."

https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/12/30/the-truth-about-the-brunson-case/

It's a bit of a long read, but interesting, especially if you've been following it.
+6 # I thought the Brunson case was a lot like a lottery ticket. — LilBirdie 2023-01-09 11:54
It didn't have any chance of winning but it was fun to hold on to it for a few days and dream.
+12 # Remember — Joedamiani 2023-01-09 11:35
This country is being destroyed by people with names and addresses,,,,, need I say more
# false flag or the beginning — A706 2023-01-10 10:25
looks like new mexico may have heard you.
# are you driving Joe? — supporttheblue 2023-01-09 12:01
??
# hint — A706 2023-01-09 14:15
deleted due to the 3 letter agencies scanning here.
+4 # Absolutely true!!! — wardoc 2023-01-09 11:50
This SCOTUS ruling shows that the US constitution no longer exists or is no longer in force. That is a fact, given the massive information in the Brunson v Adams review of constitutional law and rules that the SCOTUS completely thumbed their noses at ( along with the dem congress in 2021). Tree watering time?
+3 # Not surprised — ALsPAL 2023-01-09 11:35
Of course they wouldn't do anything to disrupt the status quo. Anyone who thinks otherwise doesn't understand.
+2 # The Burning Times wrong post — CJ 2023-01-09 11:34
Meant this for the WHO article but what the heck. Can apply to this also.
# The Burning Times — CJ 2023-01-09 11:32
The Burning Times are returning brought to the world by the same continent of idiots -Europe. This time we won't be called witches but anti social terrorists. Somethings never change.
+13 # RE: The Burning Times — 389rivka@gmail.com 2023-01-09 11:50
Normal ain’t coming back —-But Jesus IS !
+5 # RE: The Burning Times — Bob 2023-01-09 12:23
Both my wife and I have t-shirts with that saying on them!

Be blessed.

 

by sur.ly
100% Trusted Informational Platform Website 2021

 

Hal Turner Radio Show Logo
Back To Top

Publisher Info:

HAROLD TURNER
Post Office Box 421
North Bergen, NJ   07047

 

E-mail: Hal.Turner@HalTurnerRadioShow.com

Tel. 201-484-0900 (Office)

SPEAK ON-THE-AIR: 201-771-3013

 

 

About