How Did Mr. Rothschild Apply for a COVID-19 Test Method Patent in 2015 When "COVID-19" Didn't exist?

World NewsDesk 06 October 2021 Hits: 46550

How did Richard A. Rothschild apply for a Patent on a Test for COVID-19 on 10-13-2015 when COVID-19 didn't exist yet?

Comments

# RE: How Did Mr. Rothschild Apply for a COVID-19 Test Method Patent in 2015 When "COVID-19" Didn't exist? — now and zen 2021-10-10 21:35

Gosh, isn't this kinda old news? I saw those patents some time in 2020! We were passing screenshots around on Twitter. Yes, test kits for a disease which didn't exist in 2015 or 2017. Then, when TPTB realized we'd discovered this, they hastily changed the pages, a la Deagel's infamous 2025 population predictions.

# RE: How Did Mr. Rothschild Apply for a COVID-19 Test Method Patent in 2015 When "COVID-19" Didn't exist? — Standing Wave TERMINATED 01-25-2022 2021-10-07 10:44

This is an interesting find, one I hadn’t seen before until today.

The folks over at
https://principia-scientific.com/proof-the-rothschilds-patented-covid-19-biometric-tests-in-2015-2017/
seem to have been thinking along similar lines ... about a year ago.
(Also at https://prepareforchange.net/2020/09/29/ultimate-proof-covid-19-was-planned-to-usher-in-the-new-world-order/ )

As Reagan said: “Trust … but verify.”

If you go to the links provided in Hal’s article, you will find links to the patent itself (eg at nih.gov) , one of which is at google:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20200279585A1

The patent itself is referred to as US20200279585A1, and the application date for this patent was 2020-05-17 by Rothschild. The application was granted 2020-09-03.
The google link for this patent (US20200279585A1 dated 2020) gives dates for events, shown below, associated with patent US16/876.114 also dated 2020-05-17, which, just to confuse things further, seems to be the same as US20200279585A1.

From https://patents.google.com/patent/US20200279585A1

Worldwide applications
2020 US 2021 US
Application US16/876,114 events
2015-10-13 Priority to US201562240783P
2016-10-13 Priority to US201615293211A
2017-04-24 Priority to US15/495,485
2019-02-11 Priority to US16/273,141
2019-12-05 Priority to US16/704,844
2020-05-17 Priority to US16/876,114
2020-05-17 Application filed by Richard A. ROTHSCHILD
2020-09-03 Publication of US20200279585A1
2021-06-01 Application granted 2021-06-01 Publication of US11024339B2
Status Active
2036-10-13 Anticipated expiration

There are documents associated with the Priority Dates, according to the google link.
The 2015 Priority Date is associated with US201562240783P, but when I look for that in google, I get “404 That’s an error. That’s all we know.”
The 2016 Priority Date is associated with US201615293211A, but when I look for that in google, I again get 404.
The 2017 Priority Date is associated with US10242713B2 (https://patents.google.com/patent/US10242713B2/en) and is titled “System and method for using, processing, and displaying biometric data”
The 2019-02-11 Priority Date is associated with US10522188B2 (https://patents.google.com/patent/US10522188B2/en) and is also titled “System and method for using, processing, and displaying biometric data”

Unfortunately, I cannot find any information prior to 2017.
It appears, however, the title “System and Method for Testing for COVID-19” is associated with the 2020 patent application and not the earlier documents, at least the ones which are available on google. I suspect, but cannot prove, documents prior to 2017 also do not refer to COVID-19, else Rothschild would have to be completely and unbelievably stupid for spilling the beans.

I believe the priority date is just a legal foothold for seniority of the concept.

+1 # Bc the priority date declares precedence over their invention, not the same as filing date — anthonyguy 2021-10-07 10:17

I don't support the Rothchild family, but if you're going to send your family conspiracy info, then you'll need to do better than this.

A priority date sets precedence for an inventor's patent. In this specific case the Rothchild family wanted to own any rights to covid-19 as early as 2015. People will interpret this as a standard safety in patents, i.e. getting the earliest possible precedence to cover your ass just in case.

We need to do better than this Hal.

# RE: Bc the priority date declares precedence over their invention, not the same as filing date — now and zen 2021-10-10 21:46

Covid did not exist then. Purportedly Covid-19 was what the WHO or CDC came up with in spring 2020 after all us peons had started calling it WuFlu and KungFlu, which of course could not be allowed. But obviously this was completely preplanned, they faked deliberating for a week or two and then announced their "completely novel" name for the "completely novel" Coronavirus.

+4 # There's still hope for humanity! — Pierre Derelicto 2021-10-07 09:19

Perhaps the MOST VITAL CV-19 INT'L NEWS (which NO ONE outside the region is talking about) is the New South Wales Supreme Court case.

I was just sent this update, from the other side of the world:

For those that may have not been following the Supreme Court hearings over the past couple of weeks against Hazaard and the NSW Government:
As per my earlier post, Professor Kristine McCartney (director of the National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance and a member of the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation), is a big key player in this whole story.
• Today, along with 20,000 + other Australians I watched the Supreme Court case continue in NSW against the government for the rollout of mandatory vaccines at times during the live telecast, there have been upto 45,000 people observing the Court proceedings)
• The barrister asked Kristine McCartney a few questions today (the player behind the scenes that insisted we lock down Victoria and mandate vaccines as the only solution)

• Barrister - ‘Is it true that double vaccinated people are 13 times more likely to catch and spread the virus?
• Kristine - Yes

• Barrister - ‘Are vaccines dangerous at all to pregnant women or those planning to fall pregnant?’
• Kristine - Yes

• Barrister - ‘Is it true that the vaccines have never been studied for effectiveness and safety’?
• Kristine - Yes, they have never been fully studied

• We are patiently waiting for what was meant to be the final hearing today and it’s looking promising that the Judge Thomas Beech Jones will put a stop to the mandatory rollout of the vaccines
• Judge Thomas Beech Jones also stated that the government suppressed the medication to the population and the government made people believe there was no way out of this unless we all get the vaccine

As a wise man once said, the people have the power, all we have to do is awaken the power in the people!

+1 # "Follow the money" ... — Pierre Derelicto 2021-10-07 08:44

... and "follow the patent applications."

Competing Interest Statement

M.G.J and K.M are named as inventors on International Patent Application No. WO/2021/21405 entitled “Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses.” MGJ is named as an inventor on International Patent Application No. WO/2018/081318 and US Patent 10,960,070 entitled “Prefusion Coronavirus Spike Proteins and Their Use.”

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.28.441763v1

+1 # It's all in plain sight — Pierre Derelicto 2021-10-07 08:47

... digging and, often, insight and reasoning are required, but TPTB always show their hand. The arrogant bastards have to rub our noses in it, after all.

https://safetydatasheets.pfizer.com/DirectDocumentDownloader/Document?prd=PF00092~~PDF~~MTR~~PFEM~~EN&fbclid=IwAR0f6GsRXdYq2wujjgtvE9HEfijtOjbvpptmGHE-42_Q8SpZIEAUPORUsyE

+7 # I find it interesting: — Pierre Derelicto 2021-10-07 08:53

... that if anyone should

1) inhale the fumes from the "vaccine," they should

"Remove to fresh air. Seek immediate medical attention/advice.", and;

2) have the vax come in contact with their skin, they should

"Remove contaminated clothing. Flush area with large amounts of water. Use soap. Seek
medical attention."

... and, yet, IT'S "SAFE" TO INJECT INSIDE A LIVING BEING??

# Sure it's "safe"... — now and zen 2021-10-10 21:38

... as long as it's injected into a useless eater, not into a highly skilled virologist working on bioweapons in a BSL4 lab! Or into a politician, banker, etc. That's why we have retracting needles or saline solution.

+2 # Mntgal — Bowlsarefilling 2021-10-07 05:48

The patents for Covid go back to 2000. This Dr Paul Martin is the expert globally who track patents. RiCO!

https://www.brighteon.com/8c3da5c2-2cb7-4dc6-8bd0-3e7dca024f69

That lawyer interviewing him, Reiner, is pulling together with other lawyers international legal suits for crimes against humanity.

This 4.5 hour presentation also covers patent issues. It's a deeper dive into anything Covid by a brilliant researcher who found inflammation is the root issue in most diseases, particularly heart disease, back in late 80's to early 90's. Cardiologist/nuclear physist/lawyer.
https://thehighwire.com/videos/live-from-event-2021-in-dallas-tx/

Go to his website https://www.flemingmethod.com/, and go under the "Event 2021" and get the pdf of all his presentation slides for your further research and verification.

+1 # Too late? — Mjs186@97vette.com 2021-10-07 09:17

I'm glad to see that different legal groups are banding together and bringing their cases against the COVID gangsters to various courts here and abroad, but by the time any of this gains traction, most people will either be dying from one of the vaxes, unemployed or driven out of business, if they're private business owner.

+2 # RE: Too late? — Bowlsarefilling 2021-10-07 10:44

Just saw this too. May this be a prophetic act of what is yet to come for our modern day criminals against humanity. My one comfort is there is a God in heaven who sees and knows all. A day is coming He will make all the wrong things right.

https://news.trust.org/item/20211007112545-uqmr9

# Here's More Patent Information To Ponder... — QuestionMark28 2021-10-07 02:25

Somebody posted this about a related patent:
https://twitter.com/jandrusk/status/1445785153385598985?s=20&fbclid=IwAR1ws9c3tRJrmOLriZu8Xc2cJ3kSFxqj3t1F09n4MYdNnVdJU3KezUHXGKI

+4 # RE: How Did Mr. Rothschild Apply for a COVID-19 Test Method Patent in 2015 When "COVID-19" Didn't exist? — orion700ak 2021-10-07 00:36

The Priority date is in 2015 and filing date in 2020. It appears to belong to a family of biometric applications, developed earlier, that was adapted to covid.

# 2020 — Kali K 2021-10-07 01:36

Right. but the filing date was May of 2020 and Covid-19 wasn't around then either!

+3 # Disregard the Above statement — Kali K 2021-10-07 08:49

Due to lack of sleep, I lost a year in time and most of my brain cells. 2020 DOES come AFTER 2019 after all does it not? Yeah, I'll admit it. I'm getting old and cranky and on this one... I was wrong.

+10 # RE: How Did Mr. Rothschild Apply for a COVID-19 Test Method Patent in 2015 When "COVID-19" Didn't exist? — gts6 2021-10-07 00:35

keep in mind: you can not patent a "virus" unless you created/invented it, of course

+6 # The original patent application — la0508 2021-10-06 23:32

appears to have been filed in May 2020.
https://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&d=PG01&s1=20200279585.PGNR.
This is not to say the whole thing was not a set-up, just that it does not appear this particular document is one of the smoking guns. It looks to me like the application was first filed in 2015 for any generic virus, and only later, in 5/20, amended to specifically list covid.

# Think — Kali K 2021-10-07 01:38

Think about it. When did Covid-19 appear. I'm talking MONTH here. How did they know in May that Covid-19 would strike months later?

+1 # OMG! — Kali K 2021-10-07 08:46

I'm getting old and warn out from this crap. This has been going on for nearly TWO years!?!? Yes, I had to stop and think after some sleep and then the dog jump starting my heart by barking right next to my ear. DUH "19" I've lost a whole YEAR??? LOL Sorry. If I could edit or delete it I would.

+3 # That may be a good catch — Man of the Atom 2021-10-07 00:42

Here is another one if you get this within 30 minutes of a "vaccination":

https://thecovidblog.com/2021/10/06/hijama-aka-cupping-desperate-workers-forced-into-vaxx-mandates-turn-to-ancient-treatment-to-remove-the-shots-after-injected/

More news, all of it interesting to me:

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/facing-forced-covid-shots-students-are-withdrawing-from-college/

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10062775/US-Chinese-scientists-planning-create-brand-new-coronavirus-leaked-proposals-show.html

Does the vaccination trigger early onset degenerative brain disease in a person already "infected" with prions (malformed proteins)?

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/woman-dies-of-degenerative-brain-disorder-after-covid-jab-sparking-fears-of-long-term-side-effects/

If this really was a medical crisis, there is no way in heaven (at least) that any medical workers would be terminated - this is a really good point:

https://vaccinedeaths.com/2021-10-06-hospital-systems-purge-thousands-of-workers-to-engineer-health-care-collapse-dark-winter-die-off.html

Meanwhile for your Canadian readers:

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/over-600-unvaccinated-doctors-on-the-brink-of-suspension-in-quebec/

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/ontario-er-doctor-resigns-over-mandatory-vaccines-and-falsehoods/

Get this quote: [80 percent of the patients she saw in the ER during the past month who had inexplicable symptoms were “double vaxxed."]

Refresh comments list
RSS feed for comments to this post

JComments

by sur.ly

100% Trusted Informational Platform Website 2021

Translate

World

How Did Mr. Rothschild Apply for a COVID-19 Test Method Patent in 2015 When "COVID-19" Didn't exist?

Comments

About