This is for Subscribers Only --
PREMIUM CONTENT:
This section of the article is only available for Subscribers who support this web site with $1 a week billed either Quarterly ($13) or monthly ($5).
This is necessary because this is a CLOUD-BASED web site. The way it works is YOU READ . . . I GET BILLED for "Data Transfer."
Despite being politely asked for voluntary donations, few people ever bothered to donate. Then, despite being asked to click an ad within a story to generate ad revenue for this site, the majority of the general public couldn't be bothered with that, either. So there's no reason to give the general public free news anymore; they don't pull their own weight.
With tens-of-thousands of people reading stories here every day, the costs nearly drove the site out of business.
In order to be able to continue providing cutting-edge news, often hours or even DAYS before Drudge and most of the "mass-media" -- if they even cover it at all -- I need to be able to sustain this effort. To do that, I rely on folks like YOU contributing a pittance of about $1 a week; which is chump-change that you won't even miss! Yet that small amount makes all the difference in the world to the continued existence of this web site.
In the final analysis, knowledge is power. Getting information first, or info that other sources simply don't report, is usually well worth a few bucks in the long run.
Please click here to choose a subscription plan in order to view this part of the article.
Subscribers LOGIN to see the story.
*** If you are having trouble logging-in, email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
YOU MUST SET YOUR WEB BROWSER TO "ACCEPT COOKIES" FROM THIS SITE IN ORDER TO LOGIN OR ELSE YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SEE PREMIUM CONTENT.
Comments
Repeated comment:
.
Intel is information bearing on some need. It's not all some spy-novel, cloak and dagger fantasy stuff that came out of a netherworld. I don't care if it's from public sources, private contacts, dark web, obscure covered-up sources supposed to be public, or whatever - the fact is I wouldn't see the information if not for Hal scouring ALL sources, including some of his exclusive ones, on our behalf.
Then, one uses the intel, not as "he said this was going to happen", but as vague context for further observed events. Everybody who has a proper view of the utility of intel and recon knows this. We receive it; it is our responsibility to process it.
Can you imagine a staff officer whining about information not being "intel" just because it included public or public-but-censored information ?? No - he would plug it in with all his other intel, which includes erroneous stuff, and make decisions he bears responsibility for. Period. All decisions are made with incomplete information - a basic management skill - you just get as much as you can, and discern it and discern from it.
I appreciate Hal's work aggregating all these sources, and then sometimes offering a very considered, sober assessment and possible conclusions I probably wouldn't have the perspective to make.
Thank you from the bottom of my heart, Hal. Illigitimiti non carborundum.
I use these and other dataponts to reach conclusions. I don't get butthurt is something doesn't happen immediately. It's just data.
There is a distinction in definition between "intel info" and "intel."
Intel info is "raw"; that is to say, qualified intel analysts have not analyzed it.
"Intelligence" is info that has been analyzed by qualified analysts, who have, as the previous commenter correctly points out, fitted it into The Big Picture.
The term "intelligence" is not interchangeable with "intelligence information." They are simply not the same things.
I just cannot for the life of me imagine what interest China could possibly have in getting involved in ground-combat ops in the Ukraine. I am guessing--just guessing--that they are NOT there for combat, but for support roles.
Is there intelligence (not mere intelligence info) on this question. Direct combat role(s) vs support roles only?
You can extricate all the Catholics gloss
and she was still the Mother of Jesus.
The mother of God. She and her son spent
30 years together.
The Jews and Protestants used to say use
bad words to describe her, like God's moll.
This isn't right.
Catholicism demands synthesis sometimes.
She was our Lord's mom. Take all the mumbo
Jumbo out of it. Being Jesus's mother makes
her instantly a cut above. This is but common
Sense. She demands our respect.
I thought we got rid of harnass-hole. Why is this garbage starting up again now? FUCK mARY.
Luke 1: 48.
Can we cut out the religion posting? Lots of readers here don't like it, and I don't blame them.
If you absolutely must blaspheme in writing, I'm sure you can find websites where that sort of thing is the everyday bill of fare.
Go there.
With all due respect to Mary, Jesus' mother, she is not leading a war against Satan. Jesus is doing this as He receives direction from His Father. In a very short time, only as few years now, Jesus will come, with His holy angels, and the war against God's enemies with be amazingly short. Victory is already assured. The empty tomb is the sign of Jesus' victory.
But you are right that it is not the Blessed Mother who is leading the fight against Satan.
I stand corrected. Thank you. However, Michael gets his marching orders from Jesus who is given them from the Father.
I agree she was tough,but it ends there. She is just another blessed member of Heaven enjoying her rewards. She is not doing anything else, I see no biblical justification to indicate otherwise. This whole Q type stuff saying she speaks and is leading this or that, is wholly meant to get your eyes off the Son. The formula is Jesus plus nothing minus nothing (see the thief on the cross for reference).
I know you mean well, but you are on a slippery trail that may not end well. Blessings to you regardless.
That was a very tactful way of putting the truth. Now it is up to the reader to ponder, or retreat into dogma. Decisions have consequences eternally. .
analysis.
The popular news channels provide
nothing.
So it gets really old when this site is polluted
by egocentric big shots, who write in
detailed correction. Hal's erstwhile helpers.
It is old reading their sanctimonious bull
Shit.
So you want to correct Hal?
GO FUCK YOURSELF.
Hal is top-shelf, the correctors are not.
We are very thankful for Hal's continual efforts.
Hal doesn't have a big staff.
Hal doesn't have a newsroom.
Hal isn't even a "mom and pop" outfit, because
Hal does it all alone.
For the bashers here, remember:
"Rudeness is a weak persons idea of strength"
"Walk with those seeking truth... RUN FROM THOSE WHO THINK THEY'VE FOUND IT."
Fake news:
China supplies weapons to Russia amid ammunition shortage. Videos of Chinese mortar shells found at positions are circulating in Ukrainian Telegram channels.
The fact:
The Russian army does not use 60mm mortars. The video captures a 1975 Chinese-made Type 27 mortar. A Chinese mortar with ammunition was captured (https://t.me/milinfolive/90681) by Russian fighters during the fighting for Rubizhnoye (https://t.me/milinfolive/84365) near Severodonetsk. Apparently, the mines were lying idle in the absence of mortars of the right calibre and have now passed back into the hands of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
China supplied these mines to Albania back in the 1970s. Albania subsequently handed them over as aid to Ukraine.
fire on Russians...
It's quite another thing to fire on Chinese.
This new friend changes everything
CHINESE?
BIGGEST QUESTION.
Which is why the full list of the $15bn+ in aid being sent to Ukraine by the U.S. government is likely to hit harder in the solar plexus.
https://raheemkassam.substack.com/p/the-full-16bn-list-of-what-biden?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Are we just going to keep going back and forth from one side to the other?
It is info to be considered and useful when reading other sites to gain a clearer picture
Thanks.
60mm M-83 Chinese-made mortar shells found in Ukraine, looks like China is supplying russia after all.
https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineWarVideoReport/comments/xgosdc/60mm_m83_chinesemade_mortar_shells_found_in/
The above post is meant as a validation of Hal's reporting! Which, for you newbies, is a common type of post here.
I don't know who this "Getsum" is below...maybe "Getsum" should move on to 'getsum' someplace else!
I readily admitted these- or ones very similar-- may already be in the public domain. I stated that!
Of course, YOU have no idea how long I have had those images and video; and chose to sit on them for reasons that are important.
Instead, you make your smartass remark as if you've caught something sinister.
I love these amateurs who join, and within two weeks, think they know enough to challenge my reporting.
Although it does get old.
disgruntled, piece of work.
You do not have to read Hal's articles,
nor listen to him Mon. through Friday.
So you precieve yourself a
USMC consultant?
You precieve yourself as helping out?
So thoughtful of you to correct
Hal.
Are you, like Simon, wanting
a little fee?
So you are a political contributor,
a scientist, a real analyst,
an intellectul all ready to set Hal straight?
Instead you sound like a has-been.
Intel is information bearing on some need. It's not all some spy-novel, cloak and dagger fantasy stuff that came out of a netherworld. I don't care if it's from public sources, private contacts, dark web, obscure covered-up sources supposed to be public, or whatever - the fact is I wouldn't see the information if not for Hal scouring ALL sources, including some of his exclusive ones, on our behalf.
Then, one uses the intel, not as "he said this was going to happen", but as vague context for further observed events. Everybody who has a proper view of the utility of intel and recon knows this. We receive it; it is our responsibility to process it.
Can you imagine a staff officer whining about information not being "intel" just because it included public or public-but-censored information ?? No - he would plug it in with all his other intel, which includes erroneous stuff, and make decisions he bears responsibility for. Period. All decisions are made with incomplete information - a basic management skill - you just get as much as you can, and discern it and discern from it.
I appreciate Hal's work aggregating all these sources, and then sometimes offering a very considered, sober assessment and possible conclusions I probably wouldn't have the perspective to make.
Thank you from the bottom of my heart, Hal. Illigitimiti non carborundum.
face when he discovered is true. That's
Zelinski.
The. End.
RSS feed for comments to this post