Russia Rehearses Nuclear Attack Launched from Kaliningrad Against European/NATO Targets

World NewsDesk 05 May 2022 Hits: 22088

For perhaps the first time in its recent history, Russia has announced that it is simulating nuclear attacks against EU and NATO countries.

Comments

# RE: Russia Rehearses Nuclear Attack Launched from Kaliningrad Against European/NATO Targets — RockyMountainBeerMan 2022-05-06 00:41

The hubris of US/NATO, poking a bear
A big bear.
A big bear that love chess.

Brilliant!

+3 # Cutting Off Your Nose To Spite Your Face — Charlie Bravo 2022-05-05 17:20

One thing seems obvious to me, the senile-insane party to this conflict is NOT Putin. I don't like the guy, certainly don't trust him --- Former KGB Chief = Dangerous / Ruthless Adversary. That said, EVERYTHING he's done has thus far been for the benefit of his own country.

Ukraine is the BREAD BASKET of Eastern Europe and strategically important for many other reasons. It would not be in Russia's interest to make it a nuclear wasteland - not to mention that the wind blows east!

Europe too, is UPWIND of Russia. "Ya don't tug on Superman's Cape, and ya don't [nuke] into the wind..." to paraphrase from an old Jim Croce song "Don't Mess Around With Jim".

If it weren't for us U.S. and the Obama-Biden-Burisma Cartel, NATO wouldn't be bothering with Russia and Ukraine... Putin knows the source of his pain.

Thus far, it seems the "sanctions" have hurt everyone BUT Russia. All of Europe now feels the pain of no gas, will feel the pain of no food, and more. At some point in the likely not too distant future, they'll start asking themselves why they are supporting this insanity and they will turn on us. There is a real risk of the dissolution of NATO.

# RE: Cutting Off Your Nose To Spite Your Face — mjc 2022-05-07 01:27

Brandon was installed, not elected.

He's here to fuck this up, not fix it.

+2 # SETUP FOR FIRST ACTION? — Dudimus Maximus 2022-05-05 15:46

It is a foregone conclusion that the conflict in Ukraine will escalate until Putin hits NATO bases and military assets with nuclear weapons - that is the first action. When George Eaton wrote that, he didnt have intel that Russia Rehearses Nuclear Attack, seems he got it right-

+3 # War Games — Charlie Bravo 2022-05-05 14:36

On the one hand, we've war-gamed nuclear war ad-infinitum.... So the idea of Russia exercising the execution of a nu-clear (not nuke-u-lar) war is not in itself alarming. Remember the movie "War Games"???

On the other hand, the risk is VERY REAL. Personally, I can't even fathom the use of a tactical nuclear weapon without there first being an all-out Nuclear First Strike! If Russia truly feels imminently existentially threatened, (and I think she is getting there) she will STRIKE FIRST, and that first strike has to be an knock-out blow. The tactical nukes will then be employed to mop up retaliatory risks in locales too close for the big bombs.

+5 # Front Man — TC 2022-05-05 13:27

Most of the stories here simplify the situation as a conflict between Russia and the US and NATO. But this is not so.

Of 195 countries 30 support the sanctions but 165 do not. These include China, India, Brazil, Indonesia and others, the majority of the world’s population and GDP. They are horrified at the insanity. They all know it may not be possible to limit the effects of a nuclear war to one area. No, not even a tiny one.

And they are horrified at how easily the West was willing to ignore its laws to steal 300 billion dollars from Russia. That money was earned from sales of oil and gas. It’s five years of their defense budget, equivalent to 4 trillion to us. Many countries have dollar accounts. When will those be confiscated? How much ass kissing is required? They feel like Cubans after the takeover by Fidel Castro. Who will be next, and is there any way to escape?

Russia and its nuclear arsenal are the front man for most of the world and everyone is praying their saber rattling will work. Financial disasters are one thing but nuclear war is another. The question is whether the West can just collapse quietly or whether they insist on taking everybody else with them.

+2 # WHY not look at the — NZ KIWI 2022-05-05 17:33

root of the problem THE LIST OF 166 , which has just been reduced 165 with RUSSIA TEETERING ON GIVING THE ROTHCHILDS THE MIDDLE FINGER

-2 # RE: Front Man — Haarnaś 2022-05-05 14:32

Quoting TC:

The question is whether the West can just collapse quietly or whether they insist on taking everybody else with them.

But, but, you also simplify the situation so much, that you even forgot to put the word Kaliningrad, a historically German region, where Russians had no business taking over after 1945, never mind keeping it after 1991.

In actual fact the financial and nuclear disasters that we are going to be facing in a few weeks is just the beginning of cascade of natural cosmic catastrophes of such magnitude that moving away to some rural ethnic region of Brazil will not be enough.

Unless you can move to another solar system in our Galaxy, or even move to another Galaxy altogether, you will not survive, no matter ho much money in the bank or gold you have in you vault. Survival will totally depend on your spiritual health and sorry American heretics, a rupture in not in God's plans!

# RE: Front Man — mjc 2022-05-07 01:31

Quoting Haarnaś:

Unless you can move to another solar system in our Galaxy, or even move to another Galaxy altogether, you will not survive, no matter ho much money in the bank or gold you have in you vault. Survival will totally depend on your spiritual health and sorry American heretics, a rupture in not in God's plans!

So.....preferred solar system, then?

-1 # for once, we somewhat agree — Dudimus Maximus 2022-05-05 16:22

Quoting Haarnaś:

In actual fact the financial and nuclear disasters that we are going to be facing are the beginning of a cascade of catastrophes of such magnitude that moving away to some rural ethnic region of Brazil will not be enough. Unless you can move to another solar system in our Galaxy, or even move to another Galaxy altogether, you will not survive, no matter ho much money in the bank or gold you have in your vault. Survival will depend on your spiritual health

I add, "condition" Saved or Not, redeemed, or not, Your Choice. Is God dead? Why do we equate dying, with being with God? Survival is more than in this present life. You are going to be eternally ALIVE ("ya survived") or eternally DEAD (ya didnt survive), you didnt make it. Your Choice.

+5 # RE: Russia Rehearses Nuclear Attack Launched from Kaliningrad Against European/NATO Targets — Eddamnit 2022-05-05 13:02

In 1945 the US government dropped the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki claiming that doing this saved lives.
Surely Russia could make the same argument in 2022.

-4 # It did save lives — Snowqueen 2022-05-05 19:30

The US and allies were predicted to lose 1 million men if we attacked the main land because the Japanese were so well armed. Many of my family including father in law were occupation troops. They saw and knew first hand. Lesson learned for us as to why the evil left wants to take our guns.

Russia has created a false paradigm that they are justified in killing Ukrainian men women and children because there are leftover Azov troops in the region. That is not justification for killing innocents. It is not the same justification the US had in 1945 to first use fire bombing while excluding the Japanese Palace and religious institutions, and last resort to use little boy and fat man to end the war.

Putin is going to do whatever the heck he wants to do. He doesn't need justification. He's a power mad murderer of women and children in addition to Azov troops. What good is he doing? He's using Nazism as an excuse to invade and kill when the real reason is he wants the bread basket and natural resources of Ukraine. NATO is not his threat. His internal lust for power and restoration of the USSR is his own personal threat. He is obsessed.

All governments on earth are corrupt- US, Russia, Ukraine, UK, France, China, DPRK, etc. none are better than the other. If one makes excuses for Russia to nuke Europe, UK and US, that person is delusional. You have no idea what you are asking for. You and your family will suffer beyond your most horrific imagination. Is that what you really want? Think about what you are saying.

# Kaliningrad Enclave. — Haarnaś 2022-05-05 10:20

Letting Russians keen the sliver of Kaliningrad as the armed camp enclave after 1991 was a major (probably inattentional) mistake by NATO.

It now enables Russia to keep the rest of Europe in permanent nuclear checkmate. There is no question that Russians will use their intermediate nuclear missile stored there!

# Kaliningrad Enclave — chip 2022-05-05 19:09

Russia might have to capture the Suwalki
Gap from Poland and Lithuania to make
sure Kaliningrad isn't cut off from
Belarus and Russia

-2 # ERRATA — Haarnaś 2022-05-05 11:09

Quoting Haarnaś:

Letting Russians keen the sliver of Kaliningrad as the armed camp enclave after 1991 was a major (probably inattentional)

Should be : Keep and Intentional

# laugh in — RickyRaccoon 2022-05-05 10:14

As the little German always said.
"Very interesting"

# RE: laugh in — mjc 2022-05-07 01:34

'Interdasting.....' NOT 'Interesting......'

+1 # RE: laugh in — clayht 2022-05-05 11:13

[quote name="RickyRaccoon"]As the little German always said.
"Very interesting"
"But Stupid, Ha Ha sheeee.."

+10 # Subs — OccamsRazor 2022-05-05 10:11

I don't think the first strikes would come from the mainland Russia, they would come from a Sub off the coast and I am sure no one would take responsibility for who's sub it was, so there is going to be a lot of confusion on who to strike back. So as soon as the first one is launched, they all will be launched. No plan survives first contact as the saying goes. No one is going to call the other country in 202 seconds and ask, "Uh excuse me, that wouldn't perchance be your Nuke coming in? If so, you need to call it off." Response: "That's a negatory, that's not our's. Good luck in finding the culprit in your Monday morning quarterbacking session."

+2 # re: Subs — 389rivka@gmail.com 2022-05-05 11:31

Yikes! Scary scenario especially when you factor in Slow Joe on our end of the conversation….it’ll take him more than 200 seconds just to ask the question !!!

+2 # Scarier — Flatfootfrank 2022-05-05 13:51

Quoting 389rivka@gmail.com:

Yikes! Scary scenario especially when you factor in Slow Joe on our end of the conversation….it’ll take him more than 200 seconds just to ask the question !!!

A scarier scenario is for the delay to be deliberate. With everything going on in the world, there are no coincidences. The destruction of Babylon is imminent.

+2 # Right place, Wrong time — 389rivka@gmail.com 2022-05-05 11:51

Need a little Dr. John…
“I been in the right world
But it seems like wrong-wrong-wrong wrong-wrong “

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuvIrvgoCag

Refresh comments list
RSS feed for comments to this post

JComments