Russian servicemen 'averted planetary catastrophe' during nuclear submarine incident, military official claims at funeral

Russian servicemen 'averted planetary catastrophe' during nuclear submarine incident, military official claims at funeral

The families of the 14 Russian servicemen who died after a fire broke out on a nuclear submarine have reportedly been told that their relatives averted a “planetary catastrophe” before they passed away.

A high-ranking military official is said to have made the comment at a funeral for the crew in St Petersburgh days after the accident in the Barents Sea earlier this week.

The incident remains shrouded in mystery after the Russian government refused to reveal the submarine’s name and its mission, claiming them as state secrets.

However, the Kremlin has said the incident was sparked by a fire in the battery compartment of the submarine.

Defense minister Sergei Shoigu said earlier this week that the onboard nuclear reactor was “operational” after the crew took “necessary measures” to protect it.

His deputy Andrei Kartapolov also claimed the “hero” submariners sealed a hatch to contain the blaze.

The Kremlin has not revealed what exactly occurred, or whether a major incident was averted by the servicemen's actions.

Paying tribute to the crew at the memorial, the unnamed military official said the submariners had prevented a much bigger tragedy, Russian news outlet Open Media reported.



“Today we are seeing off the crew of a research deep water apparatus, who died while performing a combat mission in the cold waters of the Barents Sea. Fourteen dead, 14 lives,” he is quoted as saying. “At the cost of their lives, they saved the lives of their comrades, saved the ship, did not allow a planetary catastrophe.”

The Independent was unable to verify the comments, which did not elaborate on the cause of the accident or how disaster was averted.

Severeal sources have identified the vessel as the A-31, or the Losharik submersible; a nuclear-powered unarmed vessel capable of deep sea missions.

Its exact design is shrouded in secrecy, but it is believed to be an experimental 70m-long craft operating in conjunction with a larger mothership submarine. Developed over 15 years beginning in 1988, it is described as the Russian military’s most advanced deep water vessel.

Some descriptions suggest that it is associated with maritime special forces missions, including spying on ocean-bed cables. It is thought to be capable of diving to depths of up to 6,000m.

Local news agency Severpost reported that the smaller submarine was likely tethered to the larger Podmoskovye atomic submarine when it emerged from the Barents Sea at the mouth of the Kola Bay.

Citing an unnamed fisherman, the publication claimed the submarine was travelling quickly back towards base, but without obvious signs of distress.


What remains unclear is how many of the servicemen survived the initial incident, and how many died on the way to hospital.

Reports that five crew members were receiving treatment in a military hospital in Severomorsk were confirmed by Mr Shoigu.

The ministry of defence later named the 14 dead. Calling them "Heroes of Russia", it said they were called. Denis Dolonsky and Nikolai Filin; first-rank captains Vladimir Abankin, Denis Oparin, Andrei Voskresensky, Konstantin Somov and Konstantin Ivanov; second-rank captains Alexander Avdonin, Alexander Vasilyev, Sergei Danilchenko and Dmitry Solovyev; third-rank captains Viktor Kuzmin and Vladimir Sukhinichev; and captain lieutenant Mikhail Dubkov.

They were buried in Serafimov cemetery nearby a monument to the 118 Russian killed when the Kursk nuclear submarine sank in 2000, the year Vladimir Putin became president.

REMINDER: YOU can keep this web site FREE to the General Public by clicking one or more of the 12 ads below which generates Advertiser revenue of two to three cents per click - no purchase necessary by you -- and helps offset operating costs for this web site.



You must login to post a comment.
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • This commment is unpublished.
    BoldlyReady · 10 months ago
    Soooooooooooo .......somehow..whatever....anyway there is story missing here USUAL the story/tail/fable/sea story is not complete ...........AND ....what happened to the U.S. submarine part of the story ?
    Interesting how this started off one direction and completely swerved off the story when it started .............did I miss something or was I dreaming ........ooops let me pull up the archive on the FIRST rendention .......surely Hal would NOT have pulled it ......................
    OOOOhh ....that planetary catastrophe could have been WWIII, these guys took on the twisted new version to stop a big one.
  • This commment is unpublished.
    Ronald Cordova · 10 months ago
    Interesting choice of words " Planetary Catastrophe".

    Even if the sub reactor went critical how would that be a "planetary catastrophe" compared to Fukushima? Maybe the term was used to console the relatives of the dead crewmen?