Today, 31 December, CDC to WITHDRAW Emergency Use Authorization for PCR Tests Used to Detect "COVID-19" - Epidemic was Total FRAUD

Today, 31 December, CDC to WITHDRAW Emergency Use Authorization for PCR Tests Used to Detect "COVID-19" - Epidemic was Total FRAUD

During the COVID-19 pandemic, positive cases have driven everything: masks, social distancing, lockdowns, economic and food destruction, mental and physical health destruction, the arrested development of millions of children, a large number of preventable suicides, and a bevy of new, rushed, and barely tested vaccines.  Yet the PCR Tests, which drive those "case" numbers, are being withdrawn TODAY by CDC.  In this article, I prove those tests were a total FRAUD.

Given that positive cases drove the entire "pandemic."  let's take an objective look at the main COVID-19 test, PCR, which determined whether a person was infected with SARS CoV-2 or not - all the while keeping in mind that positive case counts were the primary driver of the aforementioned restrictions.

First, we being with the announcement by CDC they are withdrawing the request for Emergency Use Authorization for the PCR tests.  Here was the July, 2021 announcement that TODAY, December 31, 2021, they are withdrawing the RT-PCR tests for COVID-19:

Why on earth would CDC do-away with the test that generated the entire pandemic" case count?   Well, it turns out, PCR tests cannot - and never could -- diagnose if a person was actually infected . . . with anything!

Below is a 3:46 video of Kary Mullis, the man who personally INVENTED the Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test.  In the video, made in the year 1993, Mullis, talking about the tests and if they could be used to diagnose HIV, said they cannot tell you if what the PCR has reproduced is what's making you sick!

Now, fast-forward to August of 2020 and Dr. Anthony Fauci of the National Institutes of Health.  During a Podcast interview, Dr. Fauci talks about how PCR tests use "Cycles" to reproduce the biological material they want to amplify to look at.   He goes on to say that these cycles, if over 35, really produce nothing but "dead nucleotides" and are not an indication that anything infectious is actually there.  It may be only fragments of something.   Here, listen to Doctor Fauci himself:

So there you have it: The inventor of the PCR test says it will amplify whatever it is told to amplify but it cannot tell if that's what's making a person sick, AND; Dr. Fauci admits that in PCR tests, if they run more than 35 cycles, the result is nothing but dead nucleotides; it really can't be relied upon to tell you anything!

Yet this is the "test" the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH), told the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) NEEDED to be approved through Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to test the country and the world for "COVID."

Why would they do that?  If they know the test won't diagnose a disease, why would they insist on using it to look for this new, allegedly dangerous, virus they called "COVID?"

Well . . . here's why:

That's why they used it.  They could up the cycle threshold or lower it to get the higher or lower infection numbers THEY WANTED; and they did!

Remember, Doctor Fauci admitted on video above, that PCR tests which have cycle thresholds "over 35" are completely unreliable.

Take a look at the Instructions that accompanied the plethora of PCR tests used throughout the country and the world to "test" for COVID:

  • ALL of them call for over 35 cycles!   
  • The GK test: 40 cycles
  • The InBios test: 45 cycles
  • The Quest Diagnostics test: 50 cycles
  • The Gnomegen Test: 39 cycles

Every single one of the tests above, using cycle thresholds over 35, were producing results that were Dead Nucleotides, and NOT actual virus infection.

The New York Times even covered this issue, and they covered it long before PCR tests were use for COVID.

In 2007, the New York Times did a story about a Doctor who got sick, got tested, and was told she had Whooping Cough!   As you may know Whooping Cough is highly contagious, so they started testing her patients too.  A slew of them were also told they had Whooping cough.  

But it turned out they used a PCR test at a high cycle threshold for all those tests and, upon further testing, the "outbreak of Whooping Cough" that some feared had become an "Epidemic" was completely false.  The PCR test so amplified dead nucleotides, that a whole slew of people thought they were infected with a highly contagious virus; and they weren't.   Here's part of that New York Times Story from 2007:

Fast-Forward to the year 2020 with Coronavirus (COVID-19) and the New York Times raised the issue yet again and another story:

In the article above, even the New York Times wrote that only ten percent of the "positive" cases MAY have actually been positive.  They reported that over 45,000 positive tests came back, but MAYBE only 4500 people actually had virus or viral loads warranting Quarantine and contact tracing!

That makes ninety percent of the alleged COVID "cases"   not cases at all!

But wait, there's more . . . and this is the "punch line" of the entire PCR test.   When they developed this so-called "test" they didn't have the actual SARS-CoV-2 virus "quantified" or "isolated."   They thought it existed, they just hadn't isolated it as of February 2020 when they started these PCR tests.   

So guess what they did?   They took something ELSE, and had it play the "character" of SARS-CoV-2 for the purposes of testing ! ! ! ! ! 

They even announced it.   

Here. Look:

So not only were the PCR tests using Cycle thresholds almost guaranteed to produce "positive" results, they developed those tests using "Characterized stocks" of OTHER viruses . . . . actors, if you will.   

ALL those positive PCR tests in the years 2020 and 2021, were not necessarily "positive" for SARS-CoV-2 because the tests themselves were unable to test for SARS-CoV-2 because they never isolated the actual virus.

The entire series of Lockdowns, masking, social distancing, and shelter-at-home, ORDERS . . .  were based on completely fraudulent test results. Too many cycles to be accurate, and testing for something that was NOT SARS-CoV-2.    This entire "pandemic" has been -- and continues to be -- total, complete, DELIBERATE, fraud.


In 2020, they came out with so-called "vaccines."   That's yet another Fraud in and of itself, but let's not go off on that tangent just now.  Let's stick to the PCR testing.

When the so-called "vaccines" came out, the push was on to get as many people vaccinated as possible.   The push was enormous.  In my 59 years on this planet, I do not recall any other push as fervent and aggressive as the push to get these "vaccines" into people.

Businesses chimed in offering things like Free Donuts to anyone who got a jab.  Local governments offered cash money $100 to everyone who got the jab.   It was amazing to sit back and watch this taking place.

Still, people didn't respond well to these new 'Vaccines."   People knew they had been rushed.  People knew that the so-called "vaccines" weren't really vaccines as we've known them for the past 100 years.

For the past 100+ years, a "vaccine" has used either active, or attenuated virus as its main ingredient.   They either injected a tiny amount of the real virus (like Smallpox) or they developed a weakened version of it and injected that weakened (attenuated) version into people.

Later, as technology improved, scientists developed "recombinant DNA" vaccines.  This was where they took an actual virus, took out its RNA guts, and replaced those dangerous guts with  harmless Yeast guts.

So the OUTSIDE of the virus looked precisely like the real one which infected people, but the inside was harmless yeast.

Our bodies would "see" the outside of the new viral invader and begin an immune response to it, but the invader could not reproduce itself because its guts were yeast guts.  Mission accomplished from the vaccine standpoint.

With COVID-19, there was no actual or attenuated virus; there was no recombinant DNA.   No.   These new COVID "vaccines" used something brand new, called "messenger RNA (mRNA)."  Scientists constructed synthetic RNA and put it into microscopic synthetic lipid envelopes which are injected into people.

When the synthetic RNA goes into the human cells, it instructs those cells to start grwoing its own Spike Protein; like the spike protein found on the outside of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.   The cells in our bodies do as they are instructed, and a whole slew of cells everywhere n our body start growing and sprouting these tiny little spikes.   Like little thorns.

Well . . .

Human body cells are not supposed to have spikes sticking out of them.

So, the scientists thought, when the immune system sees these spikes, the immune system will  start attacking them.   Thus, they thought, the immune system would then be "taught" to go after the spike proteins and when the real SARS-CoV-2 virus actually infected a person, their immune system would be ready because it already learned how to attack the spike proteins found on SARS-CoV-2.

What they THOUGHT, and what they got, were two very different things.


When the vaccines came out, news of people dropping dead within hours or days after getting the jab, started coming out.  So what did CDC and NIH do?  Suppressed the information.  They hid it.   And thy told their pals in media and at social media companies that giving out this information was "harmful" because it would dissuade people from getting the vaccines.  So the social media companies all began censoring and shutting off the flow of information that did not promote the vaccines.

For a few months, the vaccine roll-out proceeded and then, something nasty happened: People who had been vaccinated, started getting sick.   With "COVID."

UH oh, how could this happen?  This isn't supposed to happen.  What's going on?

Well, at first, CDC, NIH, and now even states, started . . . suppressing the information.  Until so many people were getting so sick, they couldn't hide it anymore.

Then states started openly reporting "Breakthrough infections."  They didn't report it for the purpose of revealing that the vaccines weren't working as advertised, they reported it to shame the unvaccinated into taking the jab!

They even began blaming the unvaccinated for creating "variants" that were sickening the vaccinated, even though they knew as a matter of scientific certainty, that the only reason "variants" are created is when a virus encounters something that interferes with it . . . like a vaccine.

It was (and still is) the vaccinated that are creating mutations/variants, and they're creating them at what some might describe as warp speed.

In all of 2020, we didn't hear a peep about variants.  But after they started giving out "the jab" we started seeing a literal onslaught on new "variants." Neither CDC, nor NIH, nor states, nor the mass media, would dare report that it was the vaccines causing this.   And neither the CDC, nor NIH, nor states, nor the media would dare report that the "vaccines" were not working.  It was all kept very hush hush.

In fact, it was kept hush hush, through more, deliberate, fraud.

Back to the PCR tests.   When "Breakthrough infections" became public knowledge, CDC issued a directive to Doctors, Hospitals, clinics and labs on what they wanted done to test these "breakthrough" infections.   This, ladies and gentlemen, is a real gem, and it speaks directly to INTENT TO COMMIT FRAUD.

CDC issued the following notice:

Do you see the Cycle Threshold CDC insisted upon when testing THE VACCINATED to see if they were COVID positive?   Twenty eight (28).

Gee, for everyone else's PCR testing, you were "positive" at 39, 40, 45 and 50 cycles, but if you're VACCINATED, the CDC demanded the Cycle threshold to test you be down to 28.   Why?

Because they wanted it to LOOK like the vaccines were working.  They wanted lower rates of positive tests, so they told Doctors, hospitals, and clinics to use the lower PCR cycle threshold when testing anyone who had been vaccinated.

In a nutshell, if you were NOT vaccinated, CDC described you as "positive" at any cycle threshold, but if you were VACCINATED, they insisted the cycle threshold be down at 28.   

This was not only clear cut medical and scientific fraud, it shows they INTENDED to artificially represent the vaccines were working and do so by intentionally lowering the cycle threshold for PCR testing for anyone who got sick, but was vaccinated.  This shows their INTENT to commit actual fraud.

Want proof the vaccines don't work?   Here. Look.  A Doctor from Italy, yesterday, December 30, 2021, showing you the positive test kits from Double-vaxed and triple-vaxed Italians all in the hospital sick:

The vaccines don't seem to work; except maybe to make people MORE susceptible to getting sick!

The final punchline . . .

The CDC also advised everyone, in December 2020, that the PCR tests could not distinguish between "COVID" and . . .  a Bacterial infection!   Here. Look:

And they made clear "the agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease."

So all those "positive" tests, were likely 90% false.  They were testing for something that was NOT "SARS-CoV-2", the cycle thresholds were lowered to test breakthrough infections so as to conceal that the vaccines weren't working, and the PCR tests, we now know, can trigger "positive" for a bacterial infection.

The entire country, and the entire world, has gone through a "pandemic" that was fake.  

Did people get sick and die?  Yes.   What sickened them?   Well, hard to tell.  Might have been the Flu.  Might have been bacterial infections.  Might have been some new novel coronavirus like "SARS CoV-2."   Did they test for it? No.   Did we all get locked down, lose jobs, and be coerced into taking experimental "jabs" they disguised as "vaccines? Yes.

Was any of this necessary?  No.

We've been snookered.   Fraud.  By professionals at CDC, NIH and a host of pharmaceutical companies who turned out to be nothing more than con artists.

But the payoff -- for them -- has been huge.  Billions of dollars spent on test kits.  Billions more spent on vaccines.   

And the fraud continues to this very day while lackeys in government continue to push for vaccines and testing.

It is long overdue that this fraud be brought to an end.

The people perpetrating the fraud aren't stopping.  It seems they are going to have to BE stopped.

Want proof?

Look at this story from yesterday in the London Daily Mail.  Biden just signed a $137 Million contract for COVID test strips, with a factory that isn't built yet, won't be built for three years, and won't be able to supply those test strips until late 2024.

They intend to push this COVID nonsense right through to the next Presidential Election, so they can claim there's another outbreak, lock everyone down, use mail-in ballots again, and steal the US Presidency -- again.

Are YOU willing to let these lying, con-artist, fraudster, thieves continue this crap for three more years?   I'm not.

They either have to stop or they have to be stopped.  If that means getting physical, then they will have brought it upon themselves.



100% Trusted Informational Platform Website 2021


Hal Turner Radio Show Logo

Publisher Info:

Post Office Box 421
North Bergen, NJ   07047



Tel. 201-484-0900 (Office)

LISTEN-BY-PHONE: 351-999-5116

SPEAK ON-THE-AIR: 201-771-3013