The situation with the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is exploding into public view today. The reality, and the fact-based revelations, are both horrifying and stunning.
The chart above shows the money funneled by USAID to just ONE entity: Bill Kristol's "Defending Democracy" organization.
If ever you wondered why Bill Kristol, allegedly a "Republican" and former Editor of "The Weekly Standard" was so adamantly opposed to Donald Trump, you can look at the chart above and realize, he was being PAID big bucks through USAID, to . . . keep the status quo? Keep an "outsider" out? All speculation, but it does make a lot of people wonder.
This is what the network for "Defending Democracy Together Institute" looks like. The graph represents grants from various USAID-affiliated Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) flowing to Kristol's non-profit:
The circle at bottom, with Employer Identification Number (EIN) 831567380, is Bill Kristol's "Defending Democracy."
Tracing the actual funds is a staggeringly enormous task, but it is being accomplaished.
According to once source, who is personally involved in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) which is auditing everything "48 vCPUs are maxed-out, curating the USAID grant network for every single EIN. It will take a while (~12 hours). Which is fine, it gives time to prettify it in the morning."
As the computers crunch all the data - and it is an utterly enormous amount of data, they are finding all the paperwork for all the money distribution. In just ONE transaction to Bill Kristol's "Defending Democracy" andother Foundation "Hopewell" distributed two million dollars to Kristol's group! Here's a screenshot of that:
That's just ONE transaction. Look at the chart above and now try to imagine how much MORE got funneled in from all those other entities! And *****ALL***** of it, coming from American Taxpayers, through funding to ****ALL**** those groups, by USAID.
Now you know how the political class stays awash in cash money. It comes from sources like USAID, which bulldozes cash out the door under the guise of "International Development."
Many people who have looked at the chart above, tell me it appears TO THEM to be a "Money Laundering Operation."
Others are saying "The only reason why you need to have a system complex like this is you are trying to hide something."
The graph above is also called "structuring" by people that prosecute money laundering. The bottom left EIN (..1860) is Hopewell, a non profit slush fund run by "Arabella Advisors." The big three Arabella fund donors are Bill Gates, George Soros, and Mark Zuckerberg.
Why is so-called "Conservative" Bill Kristol, getting money from folks like THEM?????
Can anyone who sees this believe that Bill Kristol is actually any kind of "conservative?" He's being fund by the leftist of left-wing sources!
Does the phrase "controlled opposition" come to mind?
One source told me "Money laundering shown as a flow chart. The picture is indeed worth a thousand words! "
Remember folks, this is just one of MANY Organizations . . . . and they’ve been doing this for DECADES all while blocking any attempt at forcing transparency.
Moreover, they couldn’t have done this without help from politicians on BOTH sides of the aisle!
Looking at this mish-mash of money flow, it seems to me, in my personal opinion, the complexity is intended. If this wasn't the government, we would be insisting on RICO indictments. In fact, maybe we should.
In my view, this is starting to look worse than any MAFIA in the world.
It's designed to be a labyrinth so confusing that even GPS would need therapy after trying to find its way out.
The more complex they make the interconnections, the more difficult it is to locate the corruption.
This is how shell companies work to avoid paying taxes. Creating a complex web such as this only solidifies that the actors know they were doing something nefarious and would like to avoid detection. But when this is done by the very government responsible for prosecuting crime, will there be any prosecution that follows?
Whatever ultimately comes out of this, one thing is now crystal clear:
This is worse than 9/11 for Democrats. USAID is the primary vessel they use to achieve their political agenda. USAID is -- and always has been -- the primary source of funding for their influence peddling schemes and for their indirect sources of income. USAID is how they accomplish their nefarious social engineering, overthrow of foreign governments, politicizing the legal system, and crushing dissent.
As more and more details emerge from the DOGE computers now crunching all these transactions and exposing the money flows, the level of squealing we begin to hear will rise.
Politicians are already out in public screeching that shutting off the US Agency for International Development (USAID) is "cutting off food to starving people." No. It's not.
What we will now be hearing is the corrupt, trying to cover what they've been doing. Don't be fooled.